Wang Yuxiang, Baba Yoshichika, Lumpkin Ellen A, Gerling Gregory J
Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;
Department of Dermatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York; and.
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul 1;116(1):218-28. doi: 10.1152/jn.00624.2015. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
Distinct patterns in neuronal firing are observed between classes of cutaneous afferents. Such differences may be attributed to end-organ morphology, distinct ion-channel complements, and skin microstructure, among other factors. Even for just the slowly adapting type I afferent, the skin's mechanics for a particular specimen might impact the afferent's firing properties, especially given the thickness and elasticity of skin can change dramatically over just days. Here, we show computationally that the skin can reliably convey indentation magnitude, rate, and spatial geometry to the locations of tactile receptors even amid changes in skin's structure. Using finite element analysis and neural dynamics models, we considered the skin properties of six mice that span a representative cohort. Modeling the propagation of the surface stimulus to the interior of the skin demonstrated that there can be large variance in stresses and strains near the locations of tactile receptors, which can lead to large variance in static firing rate. However, variance is significantly reduced when the stimulus tip is controlled by surface pressure and compressive stress is measured near the end organs. This particular transformation affords the least variability in predicted firing rates compared with others derived from displacement, force, strain energy density, or compressive strain. Amid changing skin mechanics, stimulus control by surface pressure may be more naturalistic and optimal and underlie how animals actively explore the tactile environment.
在不同类型的皮肤传入神经之间观察到了神经元放电的不同模式。这种差异可能归因于终末器官形态、不同的离子通道组成以及皮肤微观结构等因素。即使对于仅缓慢适应的I型传入神经,特定标本的皮肤力学特性也可能影响传入神经的放电特性,特别是考虑到皮肤的厚度和弹性在短短几天内就可能发生显著变化。在此,我们通过计算表明,即使在皮肤结构发生变化的情况下,皮肤仍能可靠地将压痕大小、速率和空间几何形状传递给触觉感受器所在位置。使用有限元分析和神经动力学模型,我们考虑了来自具有代表性群体的六只小鼠的皮肤特性。对表面刺激向皮肤内部传播的建模表明,在触觉感受器位置附近的应力和应变可能存在很大差异,这可能导致静态放电率出现很大差异。然而,当刺激尖端由表面压力控制且在终末器官附近测量压缩应力时,差异会显著减小。与从位移、力、应变能密度或压缩应变得出的其他结果相比,这种特定的转换在预测放电率方面具有最小的变异性。在皮肤力学不断变化的情况下,通过表面压力进行刺激控制可能更符合自然规律且最为理想,并且是动物积极探索触觉环境的基础。