Liu Jie, Tang Hui, Zhang Bo, Deng Xiling, Zhao Feilang, Zuo Peng, Ye Bang-Ce, Li Yingchun
Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Phytomedicine Resources for Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Shihezi University, Shihezi, 832000, China.
Jiangsu Devote Instrumental Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223001, China.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Jun;408(16):4287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9520-1. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
A molecularly imprinted polymer decorated glassy carbon electrode (MIP/GCE) is facilely developed into an electrochemical sensing platform for detection of metronidazole (MNZ). MIP preparation was carried out via in situ electropolymerization and o-phenylenediamine was selected as the optimal functional monomer. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were employed to characterize and assess the performance of the so-obtained sensor. In particular, two assay methods, which are based on different principles, were involved in the detection procedure. One is based on MIP/catalysis (Method І) and the other is MIP/gate effect (Method II). Comparison of these two methods was made in the aspects including detection range, sensitivity, accuracy, selectivity, repeatability, and long-term stability. It is found that Method І affords a lower detection limit of 3.33 × 10(-10) M (S/N = 3) while the detection limit of Method II is 6.67 × 10(-10) M (S/N = 3). The linear range of Method І and II is 1.0 × 10(-9) to 1.0 × 10(-8) M and 2.0 × 10(-9) to 1.0 × 10(-7) M, respectively. The MIP/GCE exhibits good recognition ability towards the template molecule-MNZ in the presence of the analogues of MNZ and other interferents, which can be ascribed to the successful imprinting effect during MIP membrane preparation. Graphical Abstract Procedure for fabricating MIP/GCE and its application in detecting metronidazole in serum.
一种分子印迹聚合物修饰玻碳电极(MIP/GCE)被简便地构建成用于检测甲硝唑(MNZ)的电化学传感平台。通过原位电聚合制备MIP,并选择邻苯二胺作为最佳功能单体。采用循环伏安法(CV)和电化学阻抗谱(EIS)对所得传感器的性能进行表征和评估。特别地,检测过程涉及基于不同原理的两种检测方法。一种基于MIP/催化(方法І),另一种基于MIP/门效应(方法II)。在检测范围、灵敏度、准确性、选择性、重复性和长期稳定性等方面对这两种方法进行了比较。结果发现,方法І的检测限较低,为3.33×10(-10) M(S/N = 3),而方法II的检测限为6.67×10(-10) M(S/N = 3)。方法І和方法II的线性范围分别为1.0×10(-9)至1.0×10(-8) M和2.0×10(-9)至1.0×10(-7) M。在存在MNZ类似物和其他干扰物的情况下,MIP/GCE对模板分子MNZ表现出良好的识别能力,这可归因于MIP膜制备过程中成功的印迹效应。图摘要制备MIP/GCE及其在血清中检测甲硝唑的应用过程。