Suppr超能文献

中低收入国家的虚弱筛查:系统评价。

Frailty Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, United Kingdom.

Health Education North East, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):806-23. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14069.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of frailty screening tools used in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

LMICs, as defined by the World Bank on June 30, 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

Elderly adults (as defined by the authors) living in LMICs.

MEASUREMENTS

Studies were included if the population under consideration lived in a LMIC, the study involved an assessment of frailty, the study population was elderly adults, and the full text of the study was available in English. The Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO databases were searched up to June 30, 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy studies with data from 22 LMICs were included in the review. Brazil, Mexico, and China provided data for 60 of the 70 studies (85.7%), and 15 countries contributed data to only one study. Thirty-six studies used the Fried criteria to assess frailty, 20 used a Frailty Index, and eight used the Edmonton Frailty Scale; none of the assessment tools used had been fully validated for use in a LMIC.

CONCLUSION

There has been a rapid increase in the number of published studies of frailty in LMICs over the last 5 years. Further validation of the assessment tools used to identify frail elderly people in LMICs is needed if they are to be efficient in identifying those most in need of health care in such settings.

摘要

目的

对在中低收入国家(LMICs)使用的虚弱筛查工具进行系统评价。

设计

系统评价。

设置

以世界银行为准,于 2014 年 6 月 30 日定义的 LMICs。

参与者

居住在 LMICs 的老年人(由作者定义)。

测量

如果考虑中的人群居住在 LMICs,研究涉及虚弱评估,研究人群为老年人,并且研究的全文为英文,则纳入研究。对 Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsychINFO 数据库进行了检索,检索时间截至 2014 年 6 月 30 日。

结果

70 项研究的数据来自 22 个 LMICs,这些研究被纳入了综述。巴西、墨西哥和中国为 70 项研究中的 60 项(85.7%)提供了数据,而 15 个国家仅为一项研究提供了数据。36 项研究使用 Fried 标准评估虚弱,20 项研究使用虚弱指数,8 项研究使用埃德蒙顿虚弱量表;这些评估工具中没有一个经过充分验证可用于 LMICs。

结论

在过去 5 年中,在 LMICs 中发表的虚弱研究数量迅速增加。如果要在这些环境中有效地识别最需要医疗保健的人群,则需要进一步验证用于识别虚弱老年人的评估工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验