Liu Zhandong, Qin Anzhen, Zhao Ben, Ata-Ul-Karim Syed Tahir, Xiao Junfu, Sun Jingsheng, Ning Dongfeng, Liu Zugui, Nan Jiqin, Duan Aiwang
Key Laboratory of Crop Water Use and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, China.
National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153809. eCollection 2016.
Long-term tillage has been shown to induce water stress episode during crop growth period due to low water retention capacity. It is unclear whether integrated water conservation tillage systems, such asspringdeepinter-row subsoiling with annual or biennial repetitions, can be developed to alleviate this issue while improve crop productivity.
Experimentswere carried out in a spring maize cropping system on Calcaric-fluvicCambisolsatJiaozuoexperimentstation, northern China, in 2009 to 2014. Effects of threesubsoiling depths (i.e., 30 cm, 40 cm, and 50 cm) in combination with annual and biennial repetitionswasdetermined in two single-years (i.e., 2012 and 2014)againstthe conventional tillage. The objectives were to investigateyield response to subsoiling depths and soil water deficit(SWD), and to identify the most effective subsoiling treatment using a systematic assessment.
Annualsubsoiling to 50 cm (AS-50) increased soil water storage (SWS, mm) by an average of8% in 0-20 cm soil depth, 19% in 20-80 cm depth, and 10% in 80-120 cm depth, followed by AS-40 and BS-50, whereas AS-30 and BS-30 showed much less effects in increasing SWS across the 0-120 cm soil profile, compared to the CK. AS-50 significantly reduced soil water deficit (SWD, mm) by an average of123% during sowing to jointing, 318% during jointing to filling, and 221% during filling to maturity, compared to the CK, followed by AS-40 and BS-50. An integrated effect on increasing SWS and reducing SWD helped AS-50 boost grain yield by an average of 31% and biomass yield by 30%, compared to the CK. A power function for subsoiling depth and a negative linear function for SWD were used to fit the measured yields, showing the deepest subsoiling depth (50 cm) with the lowest SWD contributed to the highest yield. Systematic assessment showed that AS-50 received the highest evaluation index (0.69 out of 1.0) among all treatments.
Deepinter-row subsoilingwith annual repetition significantly boosts yield by alleviating SWD in critical growth period and increasing SWS in 20-80 cm soil depth. The results allow us to conclude that AS-50 can be adopted as an effective approach to increase crop productivity, alleviate water stress, and improve soil water availability for spring maize in northern China.
长期耕作已被证明会因保水能力低而在作物生长期间引发水分胁迫事件。目前尚不清楚是否可以开发综合节水耕作系统,如每年或每两年重复一次的春季行间深松,以缓解这一问题并提高作物生产力。
2009年至2014年在中国北方焦作试验站的石灰性潮土上的春玉米种植系统中进行了试验。在两个单年份(即2012年和2014年)测定了三种深松深度(即30厘米、40厘米和50厘米)与每年和每两年重复相结合的效果,并与传统耕作进行了对比。目的是研究产量对深松深度和土壤水分亏缺(SWD)的响应,并通过系统评估确定最有效的深松处理。
每年深松至50厘米(AS-50)使0-20厘米土壤深度的土壤储水量(SWS,毫米)平均增加8%,20-80厘米深度增加19%,80-120厘米深度增加10%,其次是AS-40和BS-50,而与对照相比,AS-30和BS-30在增加0-120厘米土壤剖面的SWS方面效果要小得多。与对照相比,AS-50在播种至拔节期土壤水分亏缺(SWD,毫米)平均显著降低123%,拔节至灌浆期降低318%,灌浆至成熟期降低221%,其次是AS-40和BS-50。增加SWS和降低SWD的综合效应使AS-50的籽粒产量平均比对照提高31%,生物量产量提高30%。用深松深度的幂函数和SWD的负线性函数拟合实测产量,结果表明最深的深松深度(50厘米)和最低的SWD导致最高产量。系统评估表明,AS-50在所有处理中获得的评价指数最高(满分1.0为0.69)。
每年重复进行行间深松通过缓解关键生育期的SWD和增加20-80厘米土壤深度的SWS显著提高产量。结果使我们得出结论,AS-50可作为提高中国北方春玉米作物生产力、缓解水分胁迫和改善土壤水分有效性的有效方法。