• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科肿瘤手术切口疝形成及其相关危险因素:一项探索性分析。

Incisional hernia formation and associated risk factors on a gynecologic oncology service: an exploratory analysis.

作者信息

Guitarte Camilla, Grant Jeremy, Zhao Huaqing, Wang Sugai, Ferriss J Stuart, Hernandez Enrique

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;294(4):805-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4100-3. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-016-4100-3
PMID:27101367
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to identify the rate of incisional hernias and associated risk factors following a vertical midline laparotomy on a gynecologic oncology service.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent a laparotomy through a vertical midline abdominal incision between September 1998 and November 2012. Hernias and various factors were identified including demographics, disease comorbidities, intraoperative variables, and suture technique. Assessment of association with hernia formation was performed using Cox regression and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-two patients with follow-up of at least 30 days were identified. Mean age was 59 years (range 21-88 years) and mean BMI was 35.9 kg/m(2) (range 17.2-84.4 kg/m(2)). Sixteen (6.3 %) developed incisional hernias with a median follow-up of 1.7 years (range 1 month to 13 years). The estimate of the 5-year probability of being hernia-free is 86 % (95 % CI 76.5-91.9). Average age of patients who developed a hernia was 66.2 years while average age of those without hernia was 58 years (p < 0.05). There was a significant association of hypertension with incisional hernia occurrence (p = 0.0035, log-rank test). Cancer was present in 100 % of patients that developed hernias and 73 % (172/236) of those that were hernia-free (p = 0.0041, log-rank test). By univariate analysis the risk of developing an incisional hernia was higher, if the abdominal fascia was closed with loop sutures (HR 4.6, 95 % CI 1.49-13.94; p = 0.008). By multivariable analysis incisions closed with loop suture had more than a fivefold increased risk of developing a hernia (HR 5.2, 95 % CI 1.65-16.39; p = 0.005). Presence of both hypertension and utilization of loop sutures had the highest risk of incisional hernia development (HR 7.1, 95 % CI 2.28-22.4; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Wound complications including incisional hernias contribute to morbidity in gynecologic oncology patients. Older age, hypertension, utilization of loop sutures, and cancer were found to be associated with hernia formation after laparotomy through a vertical midline abdominal incision. The use of loop sutures to close the abdominal fascia should be investigated further.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定妇科肿瘤手术中经腹正中垂直切口剖腹术后切口疝的发生率及相关危险因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为1998年9月至2012年11月间经腹正中垂直切口进行剖腹手术的患者。确定了疝及各种因素,包括人口统计学特征、疾病合并症、术中变量和缝合技术。使用Cox回归和对数秩检验评估与疝形成的相关性。

结果

确定了252例随访至少30天的患者。平均年龄为59岁(范围21 - 88岁),平均体重指数为35.9kg/m²(范围17.2 - 84.4kg/m²)。16例(6.3%)发生切口疝,中位随访时间为1.7年(范围1个月至13年)。无疝的5年概率估计为86%(95%CI 76.5 - 91.9)。发生疝的患者平均年龄为66.2岁,未发生疝的患者平均年龄为58岁(p < 0.05)。高血压与切口疝的发生有显著相关性(p = 0.0035,对数秩检验)。发生疝的患者中100%患有癌症,无疝患者中73%(172/236)患有癌症(p = 0.0041,对数秩检验)。单因素分析显示,如果用环形缝合法关闭腹横筋膜,发生切口疝的风险更高(HR 4.6,95%CI 1.49 - 13.94;p = 0.008)。多因素分析显示,用环形缝合法关闭的切口发生疝的风险增加了五倍多(HR 5.2,95%CI 1.65 - 16.39;p = 0.005)。同时存在高血压和使用环形缝合法发生切口疝的风险最高(HR 7.1,95%CI 2.28 - 22.4;p = 0.001)。

结论

包括切口疝在内的伤口并发症会增加妇科肿瘤患者的发病率。发现年龄较大、高血压、使用环形缝合法和癌症与经腹正中垂直切口剖腹术后疝的形成有关。使用环形缝合法关闭腹横筋膜的情况应进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Incisional hernia formation and associated risk factors on a gynecologic oncology service: an exploratory analysis.妇科肿瘤手术切口疝形成及其相关危险因素:一项探索性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;294(4):805-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4100-3. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
2
Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.妇科肿瘤学中的单孔腹腔镜手术:单一机构的七年经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):610.e1-610.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.剖腹术闭合技术:外科医生是否遵循最新指南?问卷调查结果。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
4
Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Reinforcement Reduces the Risk of Incisional Hernia, Two-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.预防性腹腔内补片加强可降低切口疝风险:一项随机临床试验的两年结果。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1687-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4363-2.
5
Small bite fascial closure technique reduces incisional hernia rates in gynecologic oncology patients.小切口筋膜关闭技术降低妇科肿瘤患者的切口疝发生率。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 May 6;34(5):745-750. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004966.
6
Incisional hernia in gynecologic oncology patients: a 10-year study.妇科肿瘤患者的切口疝:一项为期10年的研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):696-700. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01192-9.
7
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.两种不同连续缝合技术关闭筋膜后择期正中切口手术伤口并发症的随机对照试验研究方案:COFACTOR 试验
Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8.
8
Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.腹部缝合时使用慢吸收与快吸收、抗菌涂层缝线,哪种缝线导致切口疝的风险更低?
Surgery. 2012 Mar;151(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.欧洲疝学会和美国疝学会更新的腹壁切口缝合指南。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1239-1250. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac302.
10
Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.手术伤口裂开和切口疝危险因素的回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Incisional Hernia After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC: A Retrospective Analysis.细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗后切口疝的预测因素:一项回顾性分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 26;61(8):1356. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081356.
2
Comparison of transumbilical and periumbilical median incisions in ovarian cancer surgery.卵巢癌手术中经脐与脐周正中切口的比较
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Dec 6;24(4):271-276. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-3-7. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
3
Does perfusion matter? Preoperative prediction of incisional hernia development.
灌注是否重要?切口疝发展的术前预测。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02018-3. Epub 2019 Aug 2.