McKenzie Rosemary, Williamson Michelle
Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 22;16:142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1387-5.
Telephone triage and advice services (TTAS) have become commonplace in western health care systems particularly as an aid to patient access and demand management in the after hours period. In 2011 an after hours general practitioner (GP) helpline was established as a supplementary service to existing 24-h nurse-TTAS in Australia. Callers to the service in the after hours period who are triaged by a nurse as needing to see a GP immediately or within 24 h may speak with a GP on the line to obtain further assessment and advice. While much research has been undertaken on the roles of nurses in TTAS and the professional identities and attitudes to new technology of community-based GPs, little is known of the perceptions of role and identity of GPs providing after hours advice on primary care helplines. This qualitative study explored the perceptions of professional identity and role, motivations and contributions to the health system of GPs employed on the Australian afterhours GP helpline in 2011-2013.
The study took a phenomenographic approach seeking to understand the essence of being a telephone GP, probing professional identity while also exploring role tensions. Twelve GPs, or 15% of the helpline GP workforce participated in the qualitative study.
The GPs experienced both personal and professional benefits and believed they were strengthening patient care and the Australian health system. However the role required a re-alignment of practice that challenged professional autonomy, the doctor-patient relationship and commitment to continuity of care. Some GPs made this role realignment more readily than others and were well suited to the helpline role. There was a strong collegial bond amongst the helpline GPs which facilitated the maintenance of professional autonomy.
Telephone GP assessment and advice does not demonstrate the same breadth as face-to-face practice and provides little opportunity for continuity of care, but this has not prevented those performing the role from identifying as a new form of generalist. The establishment of an after hours GP helpline in Australia has seen the emergence of a new generalist primary care identity as telehealth innovators.
电话分诊与咨询服务(TTAS)在西方医疗保健系统中已变得司空见惯,尤其是作为一种在非工作时间帮助患者就医及管理需求的手段。2011年,澳大利亚设立了一条非工作时间全科医生(GP)热线,作为现有24小时护士电话分诊与咨询服务的补充服务。在非工作时间拨打该服务热线的来电者,若被护士分诊为需要立即或在24小时内看全科医生,可与在线全科医生通话,以获得进一步评估和建议。虽然已有大量研究探讨了护士在电话分诊与咨询服务中的角色,以及社区全科医生的职业身份和对新技术的态度,但对于在初级保健热线提供非工作时间咨询的全科医生的角色认知和身份认同知之甚少。这项定性研究探讨了2011 - 2013年在澳大利亚非工作时间全科医生热线上工作的全科医生对职业身份和角色的认知、动机以及对卫生系统的贡献。
该研究采用现象学方法,旨在了解作为电话全科医生的本质,探究职业身份,同时探讨角色冲突。12名全科医生,即热线全科医生队伍的15%,参与了这项定性研究。
全科医生体验到了个人和职业方面的益处,并认为他们在加强患者护理和澳大利亚卫生系统。然而,这个角色需要对执业方式进行重新调整,这对职业自主性、医患关系以及持续护理的承诺构成了挑战。一些全科医生比其他医生更容易进行这种角色调整,并且非常适合热线角色。热线全科医生之间存在着强烈的同事关系纽带,这有助于维持职业自主性。
电话全科医生评估和咨询的范围不如面对面诊疗广泛,并且几乎没有提供持续护理的机会,但这并没有阻止承担该角色的人将自己视为一种新型的通科医生。澳大利亚非工作时间全科医生热线的设立见证了一种新型通科初级保健身份作为远程医疗创新者的出现。