• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新版 ICD-10 版多功能澳大利亚共病评分系统在老年人群中优于 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 共病评分系统。

New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.

机构信息

Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.004
PMID:27101889
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To translate, validate, and compare performance of an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System (MACSS) against commonly used comorbidity measures in the prediction of short- and long-term mortality, 28-day all-cause readmission, and length of stay (LOS).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Hospitalization and death data were linked for 25,374 New South Wales residents aged 65 years and older, admitted with a hip fracture between 2008 and 2012. Comorbidities were identified according to the MACSS, Charlson, and Elixhauser definitions using ICD-10 coding algorithms. Regression models were fitted and area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike Information Criterion assessed.

RESULTS

The ICD-10 MACSS had excellent discriminating ability in predicting inhospital mortality (AUC = 0.81) and 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.80), acceptable prediction of 1-year mortality (AUC = 0.76) but poor discrimination for 28-day readmission and LOS. The MACSS algorithm provided better model fit than either Charlson or Elixhauser algorithm for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This work presents a rigorous translation of the ICD-9 MACSS for use with ICD-10 coded data. The updated ICD-10 MACSS outperformed both Charlson and Elixhauser measures in an older population and is recommended for use with large administrative data sets in predicting mortality outcomes.

摘要

目的

将多功能澳大利亚合并症评分系统(MACSS)的国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)版本翻译成简体中文,并与常用合并症测量方法进行比较,以预测短期和长期死亡率、28 天全因再入院率和住院时间(LOS)。

研究设计和设置

2008 年至 2012 年间,对新南威尔士州 25374 名 65 岁及以上髋部骨折住院患者进行了住院和死亡数据链接。根据 MACSS、Charlson 和 Elixhauser 定义,使用 ICD-10 编码算法确定合并症。拟合回归模型,并评估曲线下面积(AUC)和赤池信息量准则。

结果

ICD-10 MACSS 在预测住院内死亡率(AUC=0.81)和 30 天死亡率(AUC=0.80)方面具有出色的区分能力,对 1 年死亡率的预测能力尚可(AUC=0.76),但对 28 天再入院和 LOS 的区分能力较差。对于所有结局,MACSS 算法提供的模型拟合优于 Charlson 或 Elixhauser 算法。

结论

这项工作对用于 ICD-10 编码数据的 ICD-9 MACSS 进行了严格的翻译。在老年人群中,更新后的 ICD-10 MACSS 在预测死亡率方面优于 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 指标,建议在使用大型行政数据集预测死亡率时使用。

相似文献

1
New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.新版 ICD-10 版多功能澳大利亚共病评分系统在老年人群中优于 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 共病评分系统。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
2
The ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture.ICD-10 Charlson 合并症指数可预测髋部骨折后的死亡率,但不能预测资源利用情况。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.验证 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 合并合并症指数在 ICD-9 和 ICD-10 中预测 30 天死亡率的有效性。
Med Care. 2018 May;56(5):441-447. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000905.
4
A multipurpose comorbidity scoring system performed better than the Charlson index.一个多用途的合并症评分系统比查尔森指数表现更好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):1006-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.020.
5
Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.国际疾病分类第9版(ICD - 9)和第10版(ICD - 10)管理数据库中查尔森合并症和埃利克斯豪泽合并症的风险调整表现。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 14;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-12.
6
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.用于在ICD-9-CM和ICD-10管理数据中定义合并症的编码算法。
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.
7
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures: A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures.预测老年颈椎骨折患者的院内死亡率:Charlson合并症指标与Elixhauser合并症指标的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 1;40(11):809-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000892.
8
Does identifying frailty from ICD-10 coded data on hospital admission improve prediction of adverse outcomes in older surgical patients? A population-based study.从入院时的 ICD-10 编码数据中识别虚弱是否能提高老年手术患者不良结局的预测能力?一项基于人群的研究。
Age Ageing. 2021 May 5;50(3):802-808. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa214.
9
Adaptation and Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Score for ICD-10-CM.ICD-10-CM合并症综合评分的适应性与验证
Med Care. 2017 Dec;55(12):1046-1051. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000824.
10
Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.中风:用于调整住院病死率合并症的埃利克斯豪泽指数。
Neurology. 2008 Jul 22;71(4):283-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000318278.41347.94.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in China.中国医院衰弱风险评分的验证
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01212-0.
2
Correlation between Charlson comorbidity index and surgical prognosis in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.老年股骨颈骨折患者 Charlson 合并症指数与手术预后的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 29;25(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07814-2.
3
Association of Drug-Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
住院中老年患者药物-疾病相互作用与死亡率或再入院率的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Sep;11(3):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
4
Health Perceptions, Multimorbidity, and New Fractures and Mortality Among Patients With a Fracture.骨折患者的健康认知、多种疾病并存情况以及新发骨折和死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248491. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8491.
5
Assessing the impact of transitioning to 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) on comorbidity indices.评估向国际疾病分类第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)过渡对共病指数的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20;31(6):1219-1226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae046.
6
Clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 orthopaedic patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-centre interrupted time series analysis across hospitals in six different countries.COVID-19 大流行期间收治的非 COVID-19 骨科患者的临床结局:六个不同国家医院间的多中心中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):e073276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073276.
7
ECMO PAL: using deep neural networks for survival prediction in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.ECMO PAL:使用深度神经网络预测静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合中的生存率。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Sep;49(9):1090-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07157-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline.在 SSO-ASTRO 切缘指南发布前后,西澳大利亚行保乳癌症手术后再次手术率。
Breast. 2023 Jun;69:499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
9
Development and validation of novel multimorbidity indices for older adults.开发和验证适用于老年人的新型多病种指数。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):121-135. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18052. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
10
Osteoporotic hip fracture-Comorbidities and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the elderly: A nine-year cohort study in Brazil.骨质疏松性髋部骨折-老年人住院死亡率的合并症和相关因素:巴西一项九年队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 12;17(8):e0272006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272006. eCollection 2022.