Fargen Kyle M, Arthur Adam S, Spiotta Alejandro M, Lena Jonathan, Chaudry Imran, Turner Raymond D, Turk Aquilla S
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee and Semmes-Murphy Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Feb;9(2):142-146. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012235. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
The effect of the five positive randomized controlled trials on thrombectomy practices and procedural volume has yet to be defined. Further, few studies have attempted to define modern thrombectomy practices in terms of selection criteria and devices used.
A 21 question survey of Society of Neurointerventional Surgery (SNIS) physicians was administered using the SurveyMonkey website, addressing current practices as well as changes from before January 1, 2015 to the months after this date.
A total of 78 responses were obtained (approximately 10% of SNIS membership). Prior to January 2015, two-thirds of respondents reported performing 1-5 thrombectomies per month (67%), with 31% performing more than 5 per month. Following January 2015, 62% of respondents reported performing more than 5 thrombectomies per month; 45% of respondents reported a higher number of thrombectomies after trial publication. 73% and 80% of respondents indicated that inpatient consultations and hospital to hospital transfers for thrombectomy have increased, respectively. A plurality of respondents reported using A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (40%) as the first strategy for revascularization. Most commonly, neurointerventionalists reported using conscious sedation (56%) for anesthesia. 74% of respondents indicated being successful with their primary technique in at least 70% of cases.
This survey of predominantly academic SNIS physicians indicates that inpatient consultations, hospital to hospital transfers, and thrombectomy procedural volumes have increased modestly since the publication of the five major stroke trials this year. In addition, many respondents indicated an increase in aggressiveness in pursuing thrombectomy based on selection criteria.
五项阳性随机对照试验对血栓切除术实践和手术量的影响尚未明确。此外,很少有研究尝试根据选择标准和使用的设备来界定现代血栓切除术实践。
通过SurveyMonkey网站对神经介入外科学会(SNIS)的医生进行了一项包含21个问题的调查,涉及当前的实践情况以及2015年1月1日前至该日期之后几个月的变化。
共获得78份回复(约占SNIS会员的10%)。2015年1月之前,三分之二的受访者报告每月进行1 - 5例血栓切除术(67%),31%的受访者每月进行超过5例。2015年1月之后,62%的受访者报告每月进行超过5例血栓切除术;45%的受访者报告在试验发表后血栓切除术数量增加。73%和80%的受访者分别表示血栓切除术的住院会诊和院际转诊有所增加。多数受访者报告使用直接抽吸首次通过技术(40%)作为血管再通的首选策略。最常见的是,神经介入医生报告使用清醒镇静(56%)进行麻醉。74%的受访者表示其主要技术在至少70%的病例中取得成功。
这项对主要为学术背景的SNIS医生的调查表明,自今年五项主要中风试验发表以来,住院会诊、院际转诊和血栓切除术手术量略有增加。此外,许多受访者表示基于选择标准在进行血栓切除术时更积极主动。