Suppr超能文献

年龄和紧急程度对胸主动脉腔内修复术后生存的影响。

Impact of age and urgency on survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

作者信息

De Rango Paola, Isernia Giacomo, Simonte Gioele, Cieri Enrico, Marucchini Alessandro, Farchioni Luca, Verzini Fabio, Lenti Massimo

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital S. M. Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital S. M. Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.054. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Elderly patients are often turned down from receiving treatment for descending thoracic aortic diseases (DTADs) because of the uncertain benefits, especially in acute settings. This study investigated the impact of old age and timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on outcomes of DTAD in patients older than 75 years of age.

METHODS

Patients from a prospective TEVAR database were dichotomized by age (75 and 80 years of age). Older and young patients were compared in three timing scenarios: (1) elective procedures, (2) any emergency (within 15 days from onset), and (3) acute ruptures (any emergency subgroup). Primary outcome was perioperative mortality assessed at 30 and 90 days.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2015, 141 consecutive TEVARs (71.6% men) were performed. Fifty-seven patients (40.4%) were older than 75 years of age; 28 were octogenarians. Eighty-three TEVARs were performed electively and 58 emergently. Among overall emergencies, 42 TEVARs were for acute ruptures. In the elective scenario, the 30-day mortality rate was 5.0% vs 0 (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.1; P = .23), and 90-day mortality was 7.5% vs 0, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively (P = .11). No octogenarian died. In the emergency scenario, 30-day mortality was 41.2% vs 9.8%, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.6-26.6; P = .01) with unchanged rates at 90 days. The mortality rate was 50% for octogenarians. In the acute rupture scenario, 30-day mortality was 40% vs 11.1% (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.10-25.99; P = .05) for patients older than 75 years of age vs those younger than 75 years of age and 46% vs 10% (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.47-37.46; P = .016) for octogenarians vs younger patients. Rates remained unchanged at 90 days. Patients older than age 75 survived for a mean of 53.98 ± 7.7 months after TEVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

In the elderly patient population with DTAD, mortality risks from TEVAR are strongly related to timing and age. When compared to younger patients, those older than 75 years of age have three to five times the risk of mortality after urgent or emergent TEVAR. However, older patients should still be considered for emergent life-saving treatment, given that the majority survives.

摘要

目的

老年患者常因治疗收益不确定而被拒绝接受降主动脉疾病(DTAD)治疗,尤其是在急性情况下。本研究调查了高龄及胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)时机对75岁以上DTAD患者治疗结果的影响。

方法

前瞻性TEVAR数据库中的患者按年龄(75岁和80岁)进行二分法分组。在三种时机情况下比较老年和年轻患者:(1)择期手术,(2)任何紧急情况(发病后15天内),(3)急性破裂(任何紧急情况亚组)。主要结局是在30天和90天时评估的围手术期死亡率。

结果

2003年至2015年期间,连续进行了141例TEVAR手术(71.6%为男性)。57例患者(40.4%)年龄超过75岁;28例为八旬老人。83例TEVAR手术为择期进行,58例为急诊进行。在所有紧急情况中,42例TEVAR手术是针对急性破裂。在择期情况下,75岁以上患者与75岁以下患者的30天死亡率分别为5.0%和0(优势比[OR],1.1;95%置信区间[CI],0.98 - 1.1;P = 0.23),90天死亡率分别为7.5%和0(P = 0.11)。没有八旬老人死亡。在紧急情况下,75岁以上患者与75岁以下患者的30天死亡率分别为41.2%和9.8%(OR,6.5;95% CI,1.6 - 26.6;P = 0.01),90天时死亡率不变。八旬老人的死亡率为50%。在急性破裂情况下,75岁以上患者与75岁以下患者的30天死亡率分别为40%和11.1%(OR,5.3;95% CI,1.10 - 25.99;P = 0.05),八旬老人与年轻患者的死亡率分别为46%和10%(OR,7.5;95% CI,1.47 - 37.46;P = 0.016)。90天时死亡率不变。75岁以上患者在TEVAR术后平均存活53.98 ± 7.7个月。

结论

在患有DTAD的老年患者中,TEVAR的死亡风险与时机和年龄密切相关。与年轻患者相比,75岁以上患者在紧急或急诊TEVAR术后的死亡风险是其三至五倍。然而,鉴于大多数患者能够存活,仍应考虑对老年患者进行紧急救命治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验