Natarajan C K, Sankar M J, Jain K, Agarwal R, Paul V K
Newborn Health Knowledge Centre (NHKC), ICMR Center for Advanced Research in Newborn Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Training and Research in Newborn Care, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Perinatol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49-54. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.32.
Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), a common cause of respiratory failure in neonates, is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the effects of administration of (a) surfactant-either as lung lavage (SLL) or bolus surfactant (BS) and (b) antibiotics on mortality and severe morbidities in neonates with MAS. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHOLIS and CABI using sensitive search strategies. We included eight studies on use of surfactant and three studies on use of antibiotics. Neither SLL nor BS reduced the risk of mortality in neonates with MAS (relative risk (RR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 1.57; and RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.66, respectively). Both SLL and BS reduced the duration of hospital stay (mean difference -2.0, 95% CI -3.66 to -0.34; and RR -4.68, 95% CI -7.11 to -2.24 days, respectively) and duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference -1.31, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.72; and mean difference 5.4, 95% CI -9.76 to -1.03 days). Neonates who received BS needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) less often than the controls (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91). Use of antibiotics for MAS did not result in significant reduction in the risk of mortality, sepsis or duration of hospital stay. Surfactant administration either as SLL or BS for MAS was found to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay; BS also reduced the need for ECMO. Administration of antibiotics did not show any significant clinical benefits in neonates with MAS and no evidence of sepsis. Given the limited number of studies and small number of neonates enrolled, there is an urgent need to generate more evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two treatment modalities before recommending them in routine clinical practice.
胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)是新生儿呼吸衰竭的常见原因,与高死亡率和高发病率相关。本综述的目的是评估给予(a)表面活性剂(以肺灌洗(SLL)或推注表面活性剂(BS)的形式)和(b)抗生素对MAS新生儿死亡率和严重发病率的影响。我们使用敏感的检索策略检索了以下数据库:通过PubMed检索MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、WHOLIS和CABI。我们纳入了八项关于表面活性剂使用的研究和三项关于抗生素使用的研究。SLL和BS均未降低MAS新生儿的死亡风险(相对风险(RR)分别为0.38,95%置信区间(CI)为0.09至1.57;RR为0.80,95%CI为0.39至1.66)。SLL和BS均缩短了住院时间(平均差值分别为-2.0,95%CI为-3.66至-0.34;RR为-4.68,95%CI为-7.11至-2.24天)和机械通气时间(平均差值分别为-1.31,95%CI为-1.91至-0.72;平均差值为5.4,95%CI为-9.76至-1.03天)。接受BS的新生儿需要体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的频率低于对照组(RR为0.64,95%CI为0.46至0.91)。使用抗生素治疗MAS并未显著降低死亡风险、败血症风险或缩短住院时间。发现以SLL或BS形式给予表面活性剂可缩短MAS新生儿的机械通气时间和住院时间;BS还减少了对ECMO的需求。对于无败血症证据的MAS新生儿,给予抗生素未显示出任何显著的临床益处。鉴于研究数量有限且纳入的新生儿数量较少,在将这两种治疗方式推荐用于常规临床实践之前,迫切需要更多关于其疗效和成本效益的证据。