Suppr超能文献

在具有纵向盲法评估的临床试验中对治疗效果和安慰剂效果进行联合估计

Joint Estimation of Treatment and Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials with Longitudinal Blinding Assessments.

作者信息

Liu Wei, Zhang Zhiwei, Schroeder R Jason, Ho Martin, Zhang Bo, Long Cynthia, Zhang Hui, Irony Telba Z

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, P. R. China; Division of Biostatistics, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Division of Biostatistics, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):538-548. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1130633. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

Abstract

In some therapeutic areas, treatment evaluation is frequently complicated by a possible placebo effect (i.e., the psychobiological effect of a patient's knowledge or belief of being treated). When a substantial placebo effect is likely to exist, it is important to distinguish the treatment and placebo effects in quantifying the clinical benefit of a new treatment. These causal effects can be formally defined in a joint causal model that includes treatment (e.g., new versus placebo) and treatmentality (i.e., a patient's belief or mentality about which treatment she or he has received) as separate exposures. Information about the treatmentality exposure can be obtained from blinding assessments, which are increasingly common in clinical trials where blinding success is in question. Assuming that treatmentality has a lagged effect and is measured at multiple time points, this article is concerned with joint evaluation of treatment and placebo effects in clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up, possibly with monotone missing data. We describe and discuss several methods adapted from the longitudinal causal inference literature, apply them to a weight loss study, and compare them in simulation experiments that mimic the weight loss study.

摘要

在某些治疗领域,治疗效果评估常常因可能存在的安慰剂效应(即患者知晓或相信正在接受治疗所产生的心理生物学效应)而变得复杂。当很可能存在显著的安慰剂效应时,在量化新治疗方法的临床益处时区分治疗效应和安慰剂效应就很重要。这些因果效应可以在一个联合因果模型中正式定义,该模型将治疗(例如,新药与安慰剂)和治疗意识(即患者对自己接受何种治疗的信念或心态)作为独立的暴露因素。关于治疗意识暴露因素的信息可以从盲法评估中获得,在对盲法成功存疑的临床试验中,这种评估越来越普遍。假设治疗意识有滞后效应且在多个时间点进行测量,本文关注的是在有纵向随访、可能存在单调缺失数据的临床试验中对治疗效应和安慰剂效应进行联合评估。我们描述并讨论了几种从纵向因果推断文献中改编而来的方法,将它们应用于一项减肥研究,并在模拟该减肥研究的模拟实验中对它们进行比较。

相似文献

1
Joint Estimation of Treatment and Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials with Longitudinal Blinding Assessments.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):538-548. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1130633. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
2
A causal model for joint evaluation of placebo and treatment-specific effects in clinical trials.
Biometrics. 2013 Jun;69(2):318-27. doi: 10.1111/biom.12005. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
3
Joint evaluation of placebo and treatment effects in cluster randomized trials by causal inference models.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107308. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107308. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 28;37(5):829-846. doi: 10.1002/sim.7567. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
8
Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):2053-2066. doi: 10.1177/0962280213513758. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing blinding in trials of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis based on blinding index.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Oct 30;219(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 May 22.
2
A causal model for joint evaluation of placebo and treatment-specific effects in clinical trials.
Biometrics. 2013 Jun;69(2):318-27. doi: 10.1111/biom.12005. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
3
Adjusting for perception and unmasking effects in longitudinal clinical trials.
Int J Biostat. 2012 Dec 31;8(2):7. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1376.
4
Causal inference in epidemiological studies with strong confounding.
Stat Med. 2012 Jun 15;31(13):1380-404. doi: 10.1002/sim.4469. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Randomized treatment-belief trials.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jan;33(1):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
6
Accounting for perception, placebo and unmasking effects in estimating treatment effects in randomised clinical trials.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2014 Jun;23(3):293-307. doi: 10.1177/0962280211413449. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
7
Placebo effect studies are susceptible to response bias and to other types of biases.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Apr 23.
8
9
Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects.
Lancet. 2010 Feb 20;375(9715):686-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2.
10
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.
Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验