• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于协同靶向最小损失估计的因果推断中数据自适应纵向模型选择。

Data-adaptive longitudinal model selection in causal inference with collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2020 Mar;76(1):145-157. doi: 10.1111/biom.13135. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13135
PMID:31397506
Abstract

Causal inference methods have been developed for longitudinal observational study designs where confounding is thought to occur over time. In particular, one may estimate and contrast the population mean counterfactual outcome under specific exposure patterns. In such contexts, confounders of the longitudinal treatment-outcome association are generally identified using domain-specific knowledge. However, this may leave an analyst with a large set of potential confounders that may hinder estimation. Previous approaches to data-adaptive model selection for this type of causal parameter were limited to the single time-point setting. We develop a longitudinal extension of a collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation (C-TMLE) algorithm that can be applied to perform variable selection in the models for the probability of treatment with the goal of improving the estimation of the population mean counterfactual outcome under a fixed exposure pattern. We investigate the properties of this method through a simulation study, comparing it to G-Computation and inverse probability of treatment weighting. We then apply the method in a real-data example to evaluate the safety of trimester-specific exposure to inhaled corticosteroids during pregnancy in women with mild asthma. The data for this study were obtained from the linkage of electronic health databases in the province of Quebec, Canada. The C-TMLE covariate selection approach allowed for a reduction of the set of potential confounders, which included baseline and longitudinal variables.

摘要

因果推断方法已经被开发出来,用于纵向观察性研究设计,其中认为混杂因素会随着时间的推移而发生。特别是,人们可以估计和对比特定暴露模式下的总体平均反事实结果。在这种情况下,纵向治疗结果关联的混杂因素通常是使用特定领域的知识来识别的。然而,这可能会给分析人员留下一大组可能阻碍估计的潜在混杂因素。以前针对这种因果参数的数据自适应模型选择方法仅限于单点设置。我们开发了一种基于协同目标最小损失估计(C-TMLE)算法的纵向扩展,该算法可用于对治疗概率模型进行变量选择,目的是改进固定暴露模式下总体平均反事实结果的估计。我们通过模拟研究来研究该方法的性质,将其与 G-计算和治疗倾向逆概率加权进行比较。然后,我们将该方法应用于一个真实数据示例,以评估轻度哮喘孕妇在特定妊娠期间吸入皮质类固醇的安全性。该研究的数据来自加拿大魁北克省电子健康数据库的链接。C-TMLE 协变量选择方法允许减少潜在混杂因素的数量,包括基线和纵向变量。

相似文献

1
Data-adaptive longitudinal model selection in causal inference with collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation.基于协同靶向最小损失估计的因果推断中数据自适应纵向模型选择。
Biometrics. 2020 Mar;76(1):145-157. doi: 10.1111/biom.13135. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
2
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
3
Collaborative targeted learning using regression shrinkage.协同靶向学习使用回归收缩。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 20;37(4):530-543. doi: 10.1002/sim.7527. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
4
Targeted learning in real-world comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.在具有随时间变化干预措施的真实世界比较效果研究中的靶向学习
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 30;33(14):2480-520. doi: 10.1002/sim.6099. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
5
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
6
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.基于靶向最大似然法的因果推断:第一部分。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 2. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1211.
7
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
8
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.
9
Scalable collaborative targeted learning for high-dimensional data.可扩展的高维数据协作靶向学习。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):532-554. doi: 10.1177/0962280217729845. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.具有反事实效应修饰因子的边际结构模型。
Int J Biostat. 2018 Jun 8;14(1):/j/ijb.2018.14.issue-1/ijb-2018-0039/ijb-2018-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2018-0039.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-varying confounders in association between general and central obesity and coronary heart disease: Longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation on atherosclerosis risk in communities study.一般肥胖和中心性肥胖与冠心病关联中的时变混杂因素:社区动脉粥样硬化风险纵向靶向最大似然估计研究
Glob Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 6;9:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2025.100193. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Many studies, but little certainty about the effects of statin discontinuation on outcomes.许多研究,但关于停用他汀类药物对预后的影响却知之甚少。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3291-3293. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19157. Epub 2024 Aug 29.