Suppr超能文献

用于诊断颈椎间盘疾病神经根受压的临床试验的有效性

Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease.

作者信息

Viikari-Juntura E, Porras M, Laasonen E M

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Mar;14(3):253-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198903000-00003.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the validity of three clinical tests (the neck compression, the axial manual traction, and the shoulder abduction test) in the diagnosis of root compression in 43 patients with cervical disc disease. The validity was investigated regarding radicular pain, neurologic signs, and root compression signs in myelography. All tests were highly specific for the validity parameters. However, the sensitivity was low; it ranged from 26 to 50% for the three single validity parameters in roots C6-8, and from 40 to 64% for combined neurologic and radiologic signs. It is concluded that, despite low sensitivity, these tests are a valuable aid in the clinical examination of a patient with neck and arm pain.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验三项临床检查(颈部压迫试验、轴向手法牵引试验和肩外展试验)对43例颈椎间盘疾病患者神经根受压诊断的有效性。针对神经根性疼痛、神经体征和脊髓造影中的神经根受压体征,对其有效性进行了研究。所有检查对有效性参数均具有高度特异性。然而,敏感性较低;对于C6 - 8神经根的三个单一有效性参数,其范围为26%至50%,对于合并的神经和放射学体征,其范围为40%至64%。得出的结论是,尽管敏感性较低,但这些检查在对有颈部和手臂疼痛的患者进行临床检查时是有价值的辅助手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验