• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TIME问卷:一种用于在养老院中引出人性并提升尊严的工具。

The TIME Questionnaire: A tool for eliciting personhood and enhancing dignity in nursing homes.

作者信息

Pan Jingyan Linda, Chochinov Harvey, Thompson Genevieve, McClement Susan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, Cancer Care Manitoba, Canada; Department of Nursing, Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, Cancer Care Manitoba, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, Cancer Care Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Geriatr Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.03.001
PMID:27112596
Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the TIME (This Is ME) Questionnaire in eliciting personhood and enhancing dignity; specifically investigating the residents' and health care providers' perspectives in the nursing home setting. Residents (n = 41) from six nursing homes in a Canadian urban center completed both the TIME Questionnaire and a feedback response questionnaire; health care providers (n = 22) offered feedback both through a questionnaire or participation in a focus group. 100% of the residents indicated the summary was accurate. 94% stated that they wanted to receive a copy of the summary, 92% indicated they would recommend the questionnaire to others, 72% wanted a copy of the summary to be placed into their medical chart. Overall HCPs' agreed that they have learned something new from TIME, and that TIME influenced their attitude, care, respect, empathy/compassion, sense of connectedness, as well as personal satisfaction in providing care.

摘要

本研究旨在评估“这就是我”(TIME)问卷在引出人格和提升尊严方面的有效性;具体调查养老院环境中居民和医疗服务提供者的观点。加拿大一个城市中心六家养老院的41名居民完成了TIME问卷和一份反馈问卷;医疗服务提供者(n = 22)通过问卷或参与焦点小组提供反馈。100%的居民表示总结准确。94%的居民表示希望收到总结副本,92%的居民表示会向他人推荐该问卷,72%的居民希望将总结副本放入他们的病历中。总体而言,医疗服务提供者一致认为他们从TIME中学到了新东西,并且TIME影响了他们的态度、护理、尊重、同理心/同情心、联系感以及提供护理时的个人满意度。

相似文献

1
The TIME Questionnaire: A tool for eliciting personhood and enhancing dignity in nursing homes.TIME问卷:一种用于在养老院中引出人性并提升尊严的工具。
Geriatr Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
2
Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers.在临床实践中引发人格意识:对患者、家庭和医疗服务提供者的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):974-80.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
Knowing about you: eliciting dimensions of personhood within tuberculosis care.了解你自己:在结核病护理中探寻人格维度。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Feb 1;21(2):149-153. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0630.
4
Nursing home staff's views on residents' dignity: a qualitative interview study.养老院员工对居民尊严的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 16;13:353. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-353.
5
Can personal dignity be assessed by others? A survey study comparing nursing home residents' with family members', nurses' and physicians' answers on the MIDAM-LTC.个人尊严能由他人来评估吗?一项比较养老院居民、家庭成员、护士和医生对《长期护理机构中的尊严评估量表》(MIDAM-LTC)回答的调查研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Feb;52(2):555-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
6
The Health Care Providers' Perspectives on End-of-Life Patients' Sense of Dignity. A Comparison Among Four Different Professionals' Categories.卫生保健提供者对临终患者尊严感的看法。四个不同专业类别之间的比较。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01577-4.
7
Realising dignity in care home practice: an action research project.在养老院实践中实现尊严:一项行动研究项目。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2017 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1111/opn.12128. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Fostering dignity in the care of nursing home residents through slow caring.通过慢关怀在养老院居民护理中培养尊严。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Nov;24(7):778-788. doi: 10.1177/0969733015627297. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Aspects of indignity in nursing home residences as experienced by family caregivers.家庭护理人员所体验到的养老院居住中的不体面之处。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Nov;20(7):748-61. doi: 10.1177/0969733012475253. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
10
Dignity and the factors that influence it according to nursing home residents: a qualitative interview study.养老院居民眼中的尊严及其影响因素:一项定性访谈研究
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):97-106. doi: 10.1111/jan.12171. Epub 2013 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Dignity in Medicine: Definition, Assessment and Therapy.《医学中的尊严:定义、评估与治疗》
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Jun;26(6):273-293. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01506-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Dignity-Conserving Practice.尊严维持实践:姑息治疗临床医生应了解的十大要点。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;27(4):537-544. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0544. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Humanizing the Intensive Care Unit: Perspectives of Patients and Families on the Get to Know Me Board.使重症监护病房更人性化:患者及家属对“了解我”展板的看法
J Patient Exp. 2023 Sep 18;10:23743735231201228. doi: 10.1177/23743735231201228. eCollection 2023.
4
Patient-Centered and Family-Centered Care in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中的以患者为中心和以家庭为中心的护理。
Clin Chest Med. 2022 Sep;43(3):539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.05.008.
5
Death, Dying, and Dignity in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情时期的死亡、临终与尊严
J Palliat Med. 2020 Oct;23(10):1294-1295. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0406. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care.培养人文精神:重症监护中的足迹项目的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e029810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029810.