• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床实践中引发人格意识:对患者、家庭和医疗服务提供者的影响。

Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers.

作者信息

Chochinov Harvey Max, McClement Susan, Hack Thomas, Thompson Genevieve, Dufault Brenden, Harlos Mike

机构信息

Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; College of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):974-80.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291
PMID:25527441
Abstract

CONTEXT

Failure to acknowledge personhood is often the cause of patient and family dissatisfaction. We developed the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) as a simple means of inquiring about personhood: "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?"

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the PDQ on patients and families, evaluate its influence on health care providers (HCPs), and determine if HCP characteristics mediate receptivity to PDQ-elicited information.

METHODS

Palliative care patients or their family members were asked to respond to the PDQ. Responses were summarized, read to participants to ensure accuracy, and with permission, placed in their charts. Patient, family, and HCP responses to the PDQ were then elicited.

RESULTS

A total of 126 participants (66 patients and 60 family members) responded to the PDQ; 99% indicated that the summaries were accurate, 97% permitted the summary to be placed in the chart, 93% felt that the information was important for HCPs to know, and 99% would recommend the PDQ for others. A total of 137 HCPs completed 293 evaluations of individual PDQs; 90% indicated that they learned something new from it, 64% that they were emotionally affected by it, 59% that it influenced their sense of empathy, and 44% that it influenced their care. HCP empathy, job satisfaction, having a meaningful life, and social support mediated responsiveness to PDQ-elicited information.

CONCLUSION

The PDQ offers an effective way of eliciting personhood, enhancing patient, family, and HCP experience alike.

摘要

背景

未能承认患者的人格常常是导致患者及其家属不满的原因。我们开发了患者尊严问题(PDQ)作为一种询问人格的简单方式:“为了尽可能给予您最佳的护理,我需要了解您作为一个人的哪些方面?”

目的

本研究旨在评估PDQ对患者及其家属的影响,评估其对医疗保健提供者(HCP)的影响,并确定HCP的特征是否介导了对PDQ引出信息的接受度。

方法

要求姑息治疗患者或其家属对PDQ做出回应。对回应进行总结,读给参与者以确保准确性,并在获得许可后放入他们的病历中。然后引出患者、家属和HCP对PDQ的回应。

结果

共有126名参与者(66名患者和60名家属)对PDQ做出了回应;99%表示总结准确,97%允许将总结放入病历,93%认为这些信息对HCP了解很重要,99%会向其他人推荐PDQ。共有137名HCP完成了对293个单独PDQ的评估;90%表示他们从中学到了新东西,64%表示他们在情感上受到了影响,59%表示它影响了他们的同理心,44%表示它影响了他们的护理。HCP的同理心、工作满意度、有意义的生活和社会支持介导了对PDQ引出信息的反应。

结论

PDQ提供了一种引出人格的有效方法,同时增强了患者、家属和HCP的体验。

相似文献

1
Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers.在临床实践中引发人格意识:对患者、家庭和医疗服务提供者的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):974-80.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
2
Knowing about you: eliciting dimensions of personhood within tuberculosis care.了解你自己:在结核病护理中探寻人格维度。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Feb 1;21(2):149-153. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0630.
3
The TIME Questionnaire: A tool for eliciting personhood and enhancing dignity in nursing homes.TIME问卷:一种用于在养老院中引出人性并提升尊严的工具。
Geriatr Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
The dignified approach to care: a pilot study using the patient dignity question as an intervention to enhance dignity and person-centred care for people with palliative care needs in the acute hospital setting.尊严关怀方法:一项试点研究,使用患者尊严问题作为干预措施,以增强急性医院环境中姑息治疗需求患者的尊严和以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Apr 9;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0013-3. eCollection 2015.
5
Portuguese Patient Dignity Question: A cross-sectional study of palliative patients cared for in primary care.葡萄牙患者尊严问题:初级保健中姑息治疗患者的横断面研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Dec;18(6):658-661. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000164.
6
The Health Care Providers' Perspectives on End-of-Life Patients' Sense of Dignity. A Comparison Among Four Different Professionals' Categories.卫生保健提供者对临终患者尊严感的看法。四个不同专业类别之间的比较。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01577-4.
7
The Portuguese versions of the This Is ME Questionnaire and the Patient Dignity Question: tools for understanding and supporting personhood in clinical care.《这就是我问卷》和《患者尊严问题》的葡萄牙语版本:临床护理中理解和支持人格的工具。
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(Suppl 3):S187-S195. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.04.04. Epub 2018 May 11.
8
Conversations Regarding Personhood: Use of the Patient Dignity Question in an Outpatient Psycho-Oncology Clinic.关于人格的对话:在门诊心理肿瘤学诊所中使用患者尊严问题。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;22(12):1574-1577. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0256. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Promoting patient-centred palliative care: a scoping review of the patient dignity question.促进以患者为中心的姑息治疗:对患者尊严问题的范围界定审查
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2016 Dec;10(4):324-329. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000237.
10
Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study.尊严谈话问题框架的开发和评估:一项针对姑息治疗患者及其家属的混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Related Values Discussions With Patients Receiving Allogeneic and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant and Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy (CAR-T): Implementation of an Early Nurse Practitioner-Led Primary Palliative Care Intervention.与接受异基因和自体干细胞移植及嵌合抗原受体疗法(CAR-T)的患者进行的健康相关价值观讨论:早期由执业护士主导的初级姑息治疗干预措施的实施
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001148.
2
A Thematic Analysis of Intensive Care Unit Diaries Content.重症监护病房日记内容的主题分析
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70107. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70107.
3
Automated Portal-Enabled Elicitation of Health-Related Patient Values in Solid Tumor Oncology: Feasibility and Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient Response.
实体肿瘤学中基于自动化门户的健康相关患者价值观引出:可行性及与患者反应相关的患者特征
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun 5:OP2500059. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00059.
4
Health-Related Values Discussions with Patients Undergoing Allogeneic and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Feasibility and Acceptability of an Early Primary Palliative Care Intervention.与接受同种异体和自体干细胞移植的患者进行的健康相关价值观讨论:早期初级姑息治疗干预的可行性和可接受性。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Feb;31(2):107.e1-107.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
5
Expected benefits and concerns regarding virtual reality in caring for terminally ill cancer patients - a qualitative interview study.关于虚拟现实在临终癌症患者护理中的预期获益和担忧:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 4;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01557-6.
6
Dignity in Medicine: Definition, Assessment and Therapy.《医学中的尊严:定义、评估与治疗》
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Jun;26(6):273-293. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01506-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
The state of transience, and its influence on the wish to die of advanced disease patients: insights from a qualitative phenomenological study.《过渡状态及其对晚期疾病患者死亡意愿的影响:一项定性现象学研究的启示》。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 26;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01380-z.
8
Beyond translation: Transcreation of a clinicians' guide to structure discussions about health-related values with Latinx patients throughout cancer.超越翻译:拉丁裔癌症患者健康相关价值观讨论的临床医生指南的转译
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Mar;120:108100. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108100. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
9
The meaning of dignity in care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in acute and intensive care.《COVID-19 大流行期间护理中的尊严的意义:急性和重症监护中的定性研究》
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Nov 30;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01311-4.
10
My virtual home: needs of patients in palliative cancer care and content effects of individualized virtual reality - a mixed methods study protocol.我的虚拟家园:癌症姑息治疗患者的需求和个体化虚拟现实内容效果的混合方法研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Oct 31;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01297-z.