Kikuchi Kenji, Suda Koichi, Nakauchi Masaya, Shibasaki Susumu, Nakamura Kenichi, Kajiwara Shuhei, Goto Ai, Inaba Kazuki, Ishida Yoshinori, Uyama Ichiro
Division of Upper GI, Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 Nov;9(4):250-257. doi: 10.1111/ases.12288. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Delta-shaped anastomosis has been recognized as a method of intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. However, the technical aspects and outcomes of the delta-shaped anastomosis in totally robotic distal gastrectomy have never been reported.
A single-institutional, non-randomized, retrospective study was performed between 2009 and 2013. During the study period, 47 patients underwent robotic distal gastrectomy followed by robotic delta-shaped Billroth I reconstruction, and 165 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy followed by laparoscopic delta-shaped Billroth I reconstruction. After 64 were excluded because of insufficient intraoperative video, 43 patients in the robotic group and 105 patients in the laparoscopic group were enrolled in the study. Short-term outcomes were determined from medical records and full-length operative videos.
There were no significant differences between the robotic and laparoscopic groups in terms of morbidity (4.7% vs 3.8%), anastomosis-related complications (0% vs 1.0%), non-anastomosis-related complications (2.3% vs 0%), or systemic complications (2.3% vs 0%). Time for reconstruction did not vary between the robotic group (16.6 min [8.8-42.9 min]) and the laparoscopic group (15.8 min [7.2-41.0 min]). There was no mortality in this series. In the conventional group, the morbidity rate was 3.8%. The anastomosis-related complication rate was 1.0% in the conventional group.
Given the excellent short-term outcomes related to anastomosis, delta-shaped anastomosis after robotic distal gastrectomy was at least as feasible and safe as delta-shaped anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
在完全腹腔镜远端胃切除术中,三角形吻合术已被公认为一种体内毕罗Ⅰ式吻合方法。然而,完全机器人辅助远端胃切除术中三角形吻合术的技术细节和结果尚未见报道。
2009年至2013年进行了一项单机构、非随机、回顾性研究。研究期间,47例患者接受了机器人辅助远端胃切除术,随后进行机器人辅助三角形毕罗Ⅰ式重建,165例患者接受了传统腹腔镜远端胃切除术,随后进行腹腔镜三角形毕罗Ⅰ式重建。因术中视频资料不足排除64例患者后,机器人组纳入43例患者,腹腔镜组纳入105例患者。通过病历和完整的手术视频确定短期结果。
机器人组和腹腔镜组在发病率(4.7%对3.8%)、吻合口相关并发症(0%对1.0%)、非吻合口相关并发症(2.3%对0%)或全身并发症(2.3%对0%)方面无显著差异。机器人组(16.6分钟[8.8 - 42.9分钟])和腹腔镜组(15.8分钟[7.2 - 41.0分钟])的重建时间无差异。本系列无死亡病例。传统组发病率为3.8%。传统组吻合口相关并发症发生率为1.0%。
鉴于机器人辅助远端胃切除术后三角形吻合术的短期效果良好,其至少与腹腔镜远端胃切除术后三角形吻合术一样可行且安全。