Moscone F, Tosetti E, Vittadini G
Brunel University London, UK.
Brunel University London, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;158:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Although there has been a sizeable empirical literature measuring the effect of job precariousness on the mental health of workers the debate is still open, and understanding the true nature of such relationship has important policy implications. In this paper, we investigate the impact of precarious employment on mental health using a unique, very large data set that matches information on job contracts for over 2.7 million employees in Italy followed over the years 2007-2011, with their psychotropic medication prescription. We examine the causal effects of temporary contracts, their duration and the number of contract changes during the year on the probability of having one or more prescriptions for medication to treat mental health problems. To this end, we estimate a dynamic Probit model, and deal with the potential endogeneity of regressors by adopting an instrumental variables approach. As instruments, we use firm-level probabilities of being a temporary worker as well as other firm-level variables that do not depend on the mental illness status of the workers. Our results show that the probability of psychotropic medication prescription is higher for workers under temporary job contracts. More days of work under temporary contract as well as frequent changes in temporary contract significantly increase the probability of developing mental health problems that need to be medically treated. We also find that moving from permanent to temporary employment increases mental illness; symmetrically, although with a smaller effect in absolute value, moving from temporary to permanent employment tends to reduce it. Policy interventions aimed at increasing the flexibility of the labour market through an increase of temporary contracts should also take into account the social and economic cost of these reforms, in terms of psychological wellbeing of employees.
尽管已有大量实证文献衡量工作不稳定对工人心理健康的影响,但这场辩论仍未定论,而理解这种关系的真正本质具有重要的政策意义。在本文中,我们使用一个独特的、非常大的数据集来研究不稳定就业对心理健康的影响,该数据集将2007年至2011年期间意大利270多万名员工的工作合同信息与其精神药物处方相匹配。我们研究临时合同、其持续时间以及一年内合同变更次数对开具一种或多种治疗心理健康问题药物处方概率的因果效应。为此,我们估计了一个动态Probit模型,并通过采用工具变量法来处理回归变量的潜在内生性问题。作为工具,我们使用企业层面临时工的概率以及其他不依赖于工人精神疾病状况的企业层面变量。我们的结果表明,签订临时工作合同的工人开具精神药物处方的概率更高。临时合同下的工作天数越多以及临时合同的频繁变更显著增加了出现需要药物治疗的心理健康问题的概率。我们还发现,从长期就业转为临时就业会增加精神疾病;对称地,虽然绝对值上的影响较小,但从临时就业转为长期就业往往会降低精神疾病。旨在通过增加临时合同来提高劳动力市场灵活性的政策干预措施也应考虑到这些改革在员工心理健康方面的社会和经济成本。