O'Brien Timothy L
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Feb;27(2):243-259. doi: 10.1177/0963662516643671. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
This article uses data from the US General Social Survey to examine the relationship between gender and support for different forms of cultural authority. An analysis of public attitudes about expert advisers and elected officials involved in policy decisions related to science reveals that women assign more influence than men to experts in decisions about global warming and stem cell research but not genetically modified food. In contrast, men assign more influence than women to elected leaders across policy domains. Importantly, gender differences in support for expert advisers and elected leaders are independent of variation in more general attitudes about science and politics. Overall, this article suggests that there are underlying differences in men's and women's attitudes about cultural authority and it highlights the importance of gender in understanding the political legitimacy of scientists in the United States.
本文使用美国综合社会调查的数据,来研究性别与对不同形式文化权威的支持之间的关系。一项关于公众对参与科学相关政策决策的专家顾问和民选官员态度的分析表明,在全球变暖和干细胞研究的决策方面,女性比男性赋予专家更多影响力,但在转基因食品方面并非如此。相比之下,在各个政策领域,男性比女性赋予民选领导人更多影响力。重要的是,对专家顾问和民选领导人支持方面的性别差异,独立于对科学和政治更普遍态度的变化。总体而言,本文表明男性和女性在对文化权威的态度上存在潜在差异,并强调了性别在理解美国科学家政治合法性方面的重要性。