Perry World House, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104;
Perry World House, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31722-31728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015637117. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Local leaders possess significant and growing authority over refugee resettlement, yet we know little about their attitudes toward refugees. In this article, we use a conjoint experiment to evaluate how the attributes of hypothetical refugee groups influence local policymaker receptivity toward refugee resettlement. We sample from a national panel of current local elected officials, who represent a broad range of urban and rural communities across the United States. We find that many local officials favor refugee resettlement, regardless of refugee attributes. However, officials are most receptive to refugees whom they perceive as a strong economic and social fit within their communities. Our study contributes to a growing literature on individual attitudes toward refugees by systematically examining the preferences of US local elected officials and offers unique insights into the views of this influential and policy-relevant group.
地方领导在难民安置方面拥有重要且不断增长的权力,但我们对他们对难民的态度知之甚少。在本文中,我们使用联合实验来评估假设的难民群体的属性如何影响地方决策者对难民安置的接受程度。我们从美国当前的地方民选官员全国小组中进行抽样,这些官员代表了美国各地广泛的城市和农村社区。我们发现,许多地方官员支持难民安置,而不管难民的属性如何。然而,官员们最欢迎那些他们认为在社区中经济和社会适应性强的难民。我们的研究通过系统地考察美国地方民选官员的偏好,为关于个人对难民态度的日益增长的文献做出了贡献,并为这一有影响力和相关政策的群体的观点提供了独特的见解。