Borchers Andrea T, Keen Carl L, Gershwin M Eric
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Suite 6510, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Department of Nutrition, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016 Dec;51(3):370-382. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8536-9.
In the United States, as in most of the world, there are large numbers of nutraceuticals that are sold and which people take to boost their immune response. There are, in addition, almost an equal number of products sold to reduce allergies. However, very few consumers, and indeed physicians, are aware of what a structure/function claim is. Structure/function claims are labeling claims that can be used to describe the potential effects of a dietary ingredient or similar substance on the structure or function of the human body. This category of claims was created by legislation contained in the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act. The intent was to supply consumers with reasonably substantiated information that would allow them to make educated choices about their diet and health. They were not intended to have the same weight and substantiation as the claims made for conventional prescription pharmaceuticals. Rather, they were proposed to fill the gap between consumer desire for over-the-counter supplements and foods, and rigorous and generally more potent and potentially "toxic" prescription medications. The legally mandated disclaimer, stating that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated the structure/function claim, often leads to misinterpretation. While there should be a biologic premise underlying the claim, there is not an absolute requirement for a conventional rigorous placebo-controlled dose response trial. While this may not be the clinical standard that a typical scientific oriented society might desire, it reflects the attempts of the FDA to find common grounds and to allow consumers to use products that are generally considered as safe based on historical use and biologic comparisons. The logic of, indeed need for, structure/function claims is straightforward; however, of equal importance is that nutraceuticals should be properly labeled, have accuracy in their ingredients, be free of contamination, be safe, and have a reasonable body of data that supports their efficacy.
在美国,和世界上大多数地方一样,有大量的营养保健品在销售,人们服用这些保健品来增强免疫反应。此外,还有几乎数量相当的产品用于减轻过敏。然而,很少有消费者,甚至医生,了解什么是结构/功能声明。结构/功能声明是一种标签声明,可用于描述膳食成分或类似物质对人体结构或功能的潜在影响。这类声明是由《膳食补充剂健康与教育法》中的立法创建的。其目的是向消费者提供有合理依据的信息,使他们能够就饮食和健康做出明智的选择。它们的分量和依据与传统处方药的声明不同。相反,它们旨在填补消费者对非处方补充剂和食品的需求与严格且通常效力更强、可能“有毒”的处方药之间的差距。法律规定的免责声明,即美国食品药品监督管理局尚未评估结构/功能声明,常常导致误解。虽然声明应该有生物学依据,但并不绝对要求进行传统的严格安慰剂对照剂量反应试验。虽然这可能不是一个典型的以科学为导向的社会所期望的临床标准,但它反映了美国食品药品监督管理局寻找共同点并允许消费者使用基于历史使用和生物学比较通常被认为安全的产品的努力。结构/功能声明的逻辑,实际上也是其必要性,是直截了当的;然而,同样重要的是,营养保健品应该有恰当的标签,成分准确,无污染,安全,并有合理的数据支持其功效。