Patil Sandeep, Dutta Sourabh, Attri Savita Verma, Ray Pallab, Kumar Praveen
Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Nov;101(6):F557-F560. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309158. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
It is common clinical practice to repeat serum C reactive protein (CRP) estimation in the first 48 h after starting empirical antibiotics for neonatal sepsis. The change in CRP is believed to indicate whether the empirical antibiotics are appropriate or not, but there is little evidence to support this practice.
This was a nested case-control study on neonates with suspected sepsis (clinical signs+baseline CRP >10 mg/L). We drew samples for serum CRP at baseline and at 24, 36 and 48 h after starting empirical antibiotics and stored them at -20°C. Those with positive blood cultures were enrolled into two groups: those who had received empirical antibiotics to which the organism was sensitive ('sensitive') and those who had received antibiotics to which the organism was resistant ('resistant'). Stored samples of these subjects were assayed for CRP. Repeated CRP values were compared between groups by mixed linear models. We evaluated change in CRP from baseline as a diagnostic test for identifying empirical use of sensitive antibiotics.
We enrolled 45 and 44 subjects in 'sensitive' and 'resistant' groups, respectively. In the 'resistant' group, median CRP increased with time but decreased in the 'sensitive' group. Decline in CRP by 48 h identified the use of antibiotics to which the organism was sensitive with 89% sensitivity and 80% specificity.
Serial CRP values in the first 48 h of antibiotic therapy help to predict whether the causative organism is sensitive to the empirical antibiotics administered.
在开始对新生儿败血症进行经验性抗生素治疗后的48小时内重复测定血清C反应蛋白(CRP)是常见的临床做法。人们认为CRP的变化可表明经验性抗生素是否合适,但几乎没有证据支持这一做法。
这是一项针对疑似败血症新生儿(临床体征+基线CRP>10mg/L)的巢式病例对照研究。我们在基线时以及开始经验性抗生素治疗后的24、36和48小时采集血清CRP样本,并将其储存在-20°C。血培养阳性的患儿被分为两组:一组接受了病原体敏感的经验性抗生素治疗(“敏感组”),另一组接受了病原体耐药的抗生素治疗(“耐药组”)。对这些受试者储存的样本进行CRP检测。通过混合线性模型比较两组之间重复的CRP值。我们评估了从基线开始的CRP变化,将其作为识别敏感抗生素经验性使用的诊断试验。
“敏感组”和“耐药组”分别纳入了45名和44名受试者。在“耐药组”中,CRP中位数随时间增加,而在“敏感组”中则下降。到48小时时CRP下降可识别出使用了病原体敏感抗生素,其灵敏度为89%,特异度为80%。
抗生素治疗开始后的48小时内连续测定CRP值有助于预测病原体是否对所使用的经验性抗生素敏感。