Kofler Michael J, Raiker Joseph S, Sarver Dustin E, Wells Erica L, Soto Elia F
Florida State University, Department of Psychology, 1107 W. Call Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, United States.
Florida International University | Department of Psychology Center for Children and Families 11200 SW 8th St. | Miami, FL 33199, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Jun;46:12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Hyperactivity, or excess gross motor activity, is considered a core and ubiquitous characteristic of ADHD. Alternate models question this premise, and propose that hyperactive behavior reflects, to a large extent, purposeful behavior to cope with environmental demands that interact with underlying neurobiological vulnerabilities. The present review critically evaluates the ubiquity and environmental modifiability of hyperactivity in ADHD through meta-analysis of 63 studies of mechanically measured activity level in children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD relative to typically developing groups. Random effects models corrected for publication bias confirmed elevated gross motor activity in ADHD (d=0.86); surprisingly, neither participant age (child vs. adult) nor the proportion of each ADHD sample diagnosed with the inattentive subtype/presentation moderated this effect. In contrast, activity level assessed during high cognitive load conditions in general (d=1.14) and high executive functioning demands in particular (d=1.39) revealed significantly higher effect sizes than activity level during low cognitive load (d=0.36) and in-class schoolwork (d=0.50) settings. Low stimulation environments, more rigorous diagnostic practices, actigraph measurement of movement frequency and intensity, and ADHD samples that included fewer females were also associated with larger effects. Overall, the results are inconsistent with DSM-5 and ADHD models that a) describe hyperactivity as ubiquitous behavior, b) predict a developmental decline in hyperactivity, or c) differentiate subtypes/presentations according to perceived differences in hyperactive behavior. Instead, results suggest that the presence and magnitude of hyperactive behavior in ADHD may be influenced to a considerable extent by environmental factors in general, and cognitive/executive functioning demands in particular.
多动,即过度的大肌肉活动,被认为是注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一个核心且普遍存在的特征。其他模型对这一前提提出质疑,并提出多动行为在很大程度上反映了为应对与潜在神经生物学易感性相互作用的环境需求而产生的有目的行为。本综述通过对63项关于ADHD儿童、青少年和成人相对于正常发育群体的机械测量活动水平的研究进行荟萃分析,批判性地评估了ADHD中多动的普遍性和环境可修饰性。校正发表偏倚的随机效应模型证实ADHD患者的大肌肉活动增加(d = 0.86);令人惊讶的是,参与者年龄(儿童与成人)以及每个ADHD样本中被诊断为注意力不集中亚型/表现的比例均未调节这一效应。相比之下,在一般高认知负荷条件下(d = 1.14)尤其是高执行功能需求下(d = 1.39)评估的活动水平,其效应大小显著高于低认知负荷(d = 0.36)和课堂作业(d = 0.50)环境下的活动水平。低刺激环境、更严格的诊断方法、活动频率和强度的活动记录仪测量以及女性较少的ADHD样本也与更大的效应相关。总体而言,结果与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)以及ADHD模型不一致,这些模型a)将多动描述为普遍行为,b)预测多动会出现发育性下降,或c)根据多动行为的感知差异区分亚型/表现。相反,结果表明ADHD中多动行为的存在和程度可能在很大程度上受到一般环境因素的影响,尤其是认知/执行功能需求的影响。