Yang Dal Mo, Kim Hyun Cheol, Kim Sang Won, Jahng Geon-Ho, Won Kyu Yeoun, Lim Sung Jig, Oh Jang-Hoon
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin Imaging. 2016 May-Jun;40(3):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
To evaluate the potential of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging to predict histological prognostic parameters by investigating whether IVIM parameters correlate with Gleason score.
The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived. A total of 41 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer who underwent prostate MRI using a 3T MRI machine were included. For eight diffusion-weighted imaging b-values (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 800s/mm(2)), a spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence was performed. D, f, D(⁎), and ADCfit values were compared among three groups of patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score 6 (n=9), 7 (n=16), or 8 or higher (n=16). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for D, f, D(⁎), and ADCfit to assess the ability of each parameter to distinguish cancers with low Gleason scores from cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores.
Pearson's coefficient analysis revealed significant negative correlations between Gleason score and ADCfit (r=-0.490, P=.001) and Gleason score and D values (r=-0.514, P=.001). Gleason score was poorly correlated with f (r=0.168, P=.292) and D(⁎) values (r=-0.108, P=.500). The ADCfit and D values of prostate cancers with Gleason scores 7 or ≥8 were significantly lower than values for prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 (P<.05). ROC curves were constructed to assess the ability of IVIM parameters to discriminate prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 from cancers with Gleason scores 7 or ≥8. Areas under the curve were 0.671 to 0.974. ADCfit and D yielded the highest Az value (0.960-0.956), whereas f yielded the lowest Az value (0.633).
The pure molecular diffusion parameter, D, was the IVIM parameter that best discriminated prostate cancers with low Gleason scores from prostate cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores.
通过研究体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数是否与 Gleason 评分相关,评估 IVIM 成像预测组织学预后参数的潜力。
机构审查委员会批准了这项回顾性研究,并豁免了知情同意。纳入了 41 例经组织学证实为前列腺癌且使用 3T MRI 机器进行前列腺 MRI 检查的患者。对于八个扩散加权成像 b 值(0、10、20、50、100、200、500 和 800s/mm²),采用自旋回波平面成像序列进行检查。比较了前列腺癌三组患者的 D、f、D⁎和 ADCfit 值:Gleason 评分为 6 分(n = 9)、7 分(n = 16)或 8 分及以上(n = 16)。生成了 D、f、D⁎和 ADCfit 的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,以评估每个参数区分低 Gleason 评分癌症与中高 Gleason 评分癌症的能力。
Pearson 系数分析显示 Gleason 评分与 ADCfit(r = -0.490,P =.001)以及 Gleason 评分与 D 值(r = -0.514,P =.001)之间存在显著负相关。Gleason 评分与 f(r = 0.168,P =.292)和 D⁎值(r = -0.108,P =.500)相关性较差。Gleason 评分为 7 分或≥8 分的前列腺癌的 ADCfit 和 D 值显著低于 Gleason 评分为 6 分的前列腺癌(P <.05)。构建 ROC 曲线以评估 IVIM 参数区分 Gleason 评分为 6 分的前列腺癌与 Gleason 评分为 7 分或≥8 分的前列腺癌的能力。曲线下面积为 0.671 至 0.974。ADCfit 和 D 的 Az 值最高(0.960 - 0.956),而 f 的 Az 值最低(0.633)。
纯分子扩散参数 D 是最能区分低 Gleason 评分前列腺癌与中高 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的 IVIM 参数。