Umbricht-Sprüngli R E, Gsell M
Praxis Dr. Umbricht, Zürich, Switzerland.
Praxis Dr. Gsell, Zürich, Switzerland; Section Gender Studies, Universität Zürich. Asien-Orient-Institut, Zürich, Switzerland.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Apr;76(4):396-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111171.
With this online survey, data on surgical interventions on the external female genitalia in Switzerland, differentiated according to functional, aesthetic and psychological reasons, were collected for the first time. In September 2013 an invitation to respond to the quantitative and qualitative questions of a comprehensive, anonymous online survey was sent by e-mail to a total of 1740 members of the Swiss Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe) and the Swiss Society of Plastic Surgery (Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Plastische Chirurgie). Follow-up enquiries were made in June 2014. By far the most frequently requested intervention was, as expected, reduction of the labia minora. The numbers of this operation had increased significantly between 1992 and 2012 (p = 0.003). Reduction of the labia minora for functional reasons decreased continuously in this period (from 50 to 40 %) while interventions for aesthetic reasons increased continuously (from 20 to 40 %). The proportion of interventions for psychological reasons remained surprisingly low during the entire investigated period of time (highest value in 2012 of 3.5 %). Evaluation of the quantitative results on the most frequently stated aesthetic, functional and psychological reasons, however, revealed a high overlap especially in the field of aesthetic and psychological reasons. This overlap points to considerable uncertainties in the medical indications for treatment. The most interesting results of this study concerns the empirical evidence that it is often difficult in clinical routine to come to a clear aesthetic, functional or psychological indication and thus there is a need for an instrument to facilitate and improve the indication-making process.
通过这项在线调查,首次收集了瑞士女性外生殖器手术干预的数据,并根据功能、美学和心理原因进行了区分。2013年9月,通过电子邮件向瑞士妇产科协会(Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe)和瑞士整形外科学会(Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Plastische Chirurgie)的总共1740名成员发送了一份邀请,要求他们回答一项全面、匿名的在线调查中的定量和定性问题。2014年6月进行了后续询问。不出所料,最常被要求的干预措施是小阴唇缩小术。1992年至2012年期间,该手术的数量显著增加(p = 0.003)。在此期间,因功能原因进行的小阴唇缩小术持续减少(从50%降至40%),而因美学原因进行的干预则持续增加(从20%增至40%)。在整个调查期间,因心理原因进行的干预比例一直低得出奇(2012年最高值为3.5%)。然而,对最常提及的美学、功能和心理原因的定量结果进行评估后发现,尤其是在美学和心理原因领域存在高度重叠。这种重叠表明治疗的医学适应症存在相当大的不确定性。这项研究最有趣的结果涉及实证证据,即在临床实践中,往往很难明确美学、功能或心理适应症,因此需要一种工具来促进和改善适应症的制定过程。