Barata Paula C, Holtzman Susan, Cunningham Shannon, O'Connor Brian P, Stewart Donna E
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Emot Rev. 2016 Apr 8;8(2):164-172. doi: 10.1177/1754073915576228.
The current work builds a definition of irritability from both academic definitions and lay perspectives. In Study 1, a quantitative content analysis of academic definitions resulted in eight main content categories (i.e., behaviour, emotion or affect, cognition, physiological, qualifiers, irritant, stability or endurance, and other). In Study 2, a community sample of 39 adults participated in qualitative interviews. A deductive thematic analysis resulted in two main themes. The first main theme dealt with how participants positioned irritability in relation to other negative states. The second dealt with how participants constructed irritability as both a loss of control and as an experience that should be controlled. The discussion integrates the findings of both studies and provides a concise, but comprehensive definition.
当前的研究工作从学术定义和外行观点两方面构建了易怒性的定义。在研究1中,对学术定义进行定量内容分析得出了八个主要内容类别(即行为、情绪或情感、认知、生理、限定词、刺激物、稳定性或持续性以及其他)。在研究2中,39名成年人的社区样本参与了定性访谈。演绎主题分析得出了两个主要主题。第一个主要主题涉及参与者如何将易怒性与其他负面状态联系起来。第二个主题涉及参与者如何将易怒性构建为一种失控状态以及一种应该加以控制的体验。讨论整合了两项研究的结果,并提供了一个简洁但全面的定义。