Oertel Joachim, Gaab Michael R, Linsler Stefan
Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Nordstadt Hospital, Affiliated Hospital Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;146:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
The endonasal endoscopic approach is currently under investigation for perisellar tumour surgery. A higher resection rate is to be expected, and nasal complications should be minimized. Here, the authors report their technique of transnasal endoscopic neurosurgery with a special reference to the impact of the use of angled optics.
Two-hundred-and-seventy-one endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal procedures were performed for sellar lesions between January 2000 and August 2013. One-hundred-and-twenty-nine patients out of them could be used for analysing the use of angled endoscopes including completed follow up, MR imaging as resection control and documentation of the intraoperative use and benefit of angled optics. Exclusion criteria were: planned incomplete resection or incomplete data set. The surgical technique was carefully analysed; and these cases were followed prospectively.
Standard technique was a mononostril approach with 0° endoscopes. Angled endoscopes were used for assessment of radicality during the tumour resection and at the end of the procedure. In 95 cases (72%), an angled endoscope was used. Remnant tumour was visualized with angled optics in 27 of the 95 cases (28%). In all these cases, remnant tumour tissue was subsequently further removed. Complete resection was seen on MRI FU in 91 of 95 cases (96%) in this subgroup. In the cases without application of angled optics, there was already a sufficient sight via the 0° endoscope (14/34; 42%), or a significant bleeding from the cavernous sinus made the application of an angled endoscope impossible (19/34; 55%). On follow up, MRI revealed radical tumour resection in 93% (120/129). In the subgroup without angled optics use, radicality reached 88% (30/34) in contrast to 96% in the angled optics subgroup. Recurrent tumour growth was observed in four patients (3%).
The endscopic technique has been shown to be safe and successful with a high radicality and only minor complications. The application of various angled endoscopes allows a look "around the corner" resulting in a potentially higher radicality of tumour resection in endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.
目前正在研究经鼻内镜入路进行鞍周肿瘤手术。预期切除率会更高,且应将鼻腔并发症降至最低。在此,作者报告他们的经鼻内镜神经外科手术技术,并特别提及了使用角度光学系统的影响。
2000年1月至2013年8月期间,对271例因鞍区病变行内镜鼻内经蝶窦手术。其中129例患者可用于分析角度内镜的使用情况,包括完整的随访、作为切除对照的磁共振成像以及术中角度光学系统的使用和益处记录。排除标准为:计划不完全切除或数据集不完整。对手术技术进行了仔细分析,并对这些病例进行了前瞻性随访。
标准技术为单鼻孔入路,使用0°内镜。角度内镜用于肿瘤切除过程中及手术结束时的彻底性评估。95例(72%)使用了角度内镜。在95例中的27例(28%)中,通过角度光学系统发现了残留肿瘤。在所有这些病例中,随后进一步切除了残留肿瘤组织。在该亚组的95例中,91例(96%)在磁共振成像随访中显示完全切除。在未使用角度光学系统的病例中,通过0°内镜已有足够视野(14/34;42%),或海绵窦大量出血使无法使用角度内镜(19/34;55%)。随访时,磁共振成像显示93%(120/129)肿瘤切除彻底。在未使用角度光学系统的亚组中,彻底性为88%(30/34),而在角度光学系统亚组中为96%。4例患者(3%)观察到肿瘤复发。
内镜技术已被证明是安全且成功的,切除彻底性高,并发症轻微。各种角度内镜的应用使得能够“转角观察”,从而在经鼻蝶窦手术中可能提高肿瘤切除的彻底性。