Kourie Hampig R, Klastersky Jean A
Institut Jules Bordet, Centre des Tumeurs de I'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2016 Jul;28(4):306-13. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000295.
After the dramatic and often long-standing response rates of checkpoint inhibitors as single agents, the new era for checkpoint inhibitors is combined therapy (either with other checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapies, targeted therapies or immunotherapies) that is aiming to do even better. Although one can speculate that these combinations will result in improved results, high cost and potential toxicity are limiting factors for their use. In this review, we plan to report on the different side-effects of the checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies and to discuss the future perspectives of these new modalities.
Many checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations are associated with high response rates (>50%) in melanomas and nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). As a result, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration; however, 30% of the patients had to discontinue this combination because of high toxicity. In NSCLC, the combination of chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed cell death protein ligand 1 agents is leading to high response rate (exceeding 65%) but with more than 40% of the patients presenting grade 3/4 toxicities. Despite the discouraging results with the combination of ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) with vemurafenib (anti-proto-oncogene protein B-raf-targeted therapy) due to hepatotoxicity, more recent trials are showing less frequent and severe toxicities with other combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies.
Despite the high toxicity rates observed with some checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies, these combinations will likely become the new paradigm for the management of various malignancies, namely, melanomas, renal cell carcinomas and NSCLC, provided that their side-effects can be effectively managed.
在检查点抑制剂作为单一药物取得显著且往往持久的缓解率之后,检查点抑制剂的新时代是联合治疗(与其他检查点抑制剂、化疗、靶向治疗或免疫治疗联合),旨在取得更好的效果。尽管有人推测这些联合治疗将带来更好的结果,但高成本和潜在毒性是其应用的限制因素。在本综述中,我们计划报告基于检查点抑制剂的联合治疗的不同副作用,并讨论这些新模式的未来前景。
许多基于检查点抑制剂的联合治疗在黑色素瘤和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中具有高缓解率(>50%)。因此,纳武单抗和伊匹单抗联合用于转移性黑色素瘤最近获得了美国食品药品监督管理局的批准;然而,30%的患者因高毒性不得不停止这种联合治疗。在NSCLC中,化疗与抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1或抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白配体1药物联合导致高缓解率(超过65%),但超过40%的患者出现3/4级毒性。尽管伊匹单抗(抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4)与维莫非尼(抗原癌基因蛋白B-raf靶向治疗)联合因肝毒性而结果令人沮丧,但最近的试验表明,其他检查点抑制剂与靶向治疗的联合毒性频率和严重程度较低。
尽管一些基于检查点抑制剂的联合治疗观察到高毒性率,但只要其副作用能够得到有效管理,这些联合治疗可能会成为各种恶性肿瘤(即黑色素瘤、肾细胞癌和NSCLC)治疗的新范式。