Ryan Michael, Bisset Leanne, Newsham-West Richard
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;45(11):823-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.0112.
We can visualize tendons better than ever before. Medical imaging today provides increasingly higher-resolution images, enabling larger fields of view that allow clinicians and researchers to more precisely characterize tendon structure. Yet, does seeing a patient's tendon provide any meaningful benefit to our clinical reasoning, and will it make a difference to treatment outcomes? It is little surprise that concomitant with this imaging availability is a renewed debate over the relationship between the appearance of tendon structure and symptomology. Despite the advances in medical imaging, as well as the clinical and research interest in tendinopathy, there does not appear to be any greater clarity on reconciling a patient's clinical presentation with either baseline characterization of structural abnormalities or the time series of changes following selected interventions. It may be helpful, therefore, to take a step back and give renewed consideration to the anatomical and physiological role of tendon structure, and to consider this in the context of what we know about tendon pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015;45(11):823-825. doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.0112.
我们现在能够比以往任何时候都更清晰地看到肌腱。如今的医学成像提供了分辨率越来越高的图像,视野范围更大,使临床医生和研究人员能够更精确地描述肌腱结构。然而,观察患者的肌腱对我们的临床推理有任何实际益处吗?它会对治疗结果产生影响吗?毫不奇怪,随着这种成像技术的出现,关于肌腱结构外观与症状之间的关系再次引发了争论。尽管医学成像取得了进展,以及临床和研究界对肌腱病有浓厚兴趣,但在将患者的临床表现与结构异常的基线特征或选定干预后的变化时间序列相协调方面,似乎并没有更清晰的认识。因此,退一步重新考虑肌腱结构的解剖学和生理学作用,并结合我们对肌腱病理学的了解来思考这一点,可能会有所帮助。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》2015年;45(11):823 - 825。doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.0112 。