Lam Wing Kai, Ding Rui, Qu Yi
a Li Ning Sports Science Research Center , Li Ning (China) Sports Goods Company , Beijing , China.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Mar;35(6):587-592. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1180420. Epub 2016 May 2.
Repeated movement (RM) lunge that frequently executed in badminton might be used for footwear evaluation. This study examined the influence of single movement (SM) and RM lunges on the ground reaction forces (GRFs) and knee kinetics during the braking phase of a badminton lunge step. Thirteen male university badminton players performed left-forward lunges in both SM and RM sessions. Force platform and motion capturing system were used to measure GRFs and knee kinetics variables. Paired t-test was performed to determine any significant differences between SM and RM lunges regarding mean and coefficient of variation (CV) in each variable. The kinetics results indicated that compared to SM lunges, the RM lunges had shorter contact time and generated smaller maximum loading rate of impact force, peak knee anterior-posterior force, and peak knee sagittal moment but generated larger peak horizontal resultant forces (Ps < 0.05). Additionally, the RM lunges had lower CV for peak knee medial-lateral and vertical forces (Ps < 0.05). These results suggested that the RM testing protocols had a distinct loading response and adaptation pattern during lunge and that the RM protocol showed higher within-trial reliability, which may be beneficial for the knee joint loading evaluation under different interventions.
在羽毛球运动中频繁执行的重复移动(RM)弓步动作可用于鞋类评估。本研究考察了单次移动(SM)弓步和RM弓步对羽毛球弓步步制动阶段地面反作用力(GRF)和膝关节动力学的影响。13名男性大学羽毛球运动员在SM和RM阶段均进行了向左前的弓步动作。使用测力平台和运动捕捉系统来测量GRF和膝关节动力学变量。进行配对t检验以确定SM弓步和RM弓步在每个变量的平均值和变异系数(CV)方面是否存在显著差异。动力学结果表明,与SM弓步相比,RM弓步的接触时间更短,产生的冲击力最大加载率、膝关节前后向力峰值和膝关节矢状面力矩峰值更小,但产生的水平合力峰值更大(P<0.05)。此外,RM弓步在膝关节内外侧和垂直力峰值方面的CV更低(P<0.05)。这些结果表明,RM测试方案在弓步过程中具有独特的负荷反应和适应模式,并且RM方案显示出更高的试验内可靠性,这可能有利于在不同干预下对膝关节负荷进行评估。