• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与在HIV感染初始治疗中选择非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)和蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)的偏好相关的社会人口统计学和临床因素:Perfil-es研究

Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the preference between NNRTIs and PIs for the initial treatment of HIV infection: Perfil-es study.

作者信息

Viciana Pompeyo, Ocampo Antonio, Hevia Henar, Palazuelos Marta, Ledesma Francisco

机构信息

a Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío , Sevilla , Spain.

b Hospital Xeral Cíes , Vigo , Spain.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2016 Oct;28(10):1321-6. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1173640. Epub 2016 May 3.

DOI:10.1080/09540121.2016.1173640
PMID:27140483
Abstract

The Perfil-es study demonstrated that, while non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) is more frequently used in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected naïve patients, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r)-based regimens are the preferred option in patients with advanced infectious stages or high baseline viral load. The present analysis focused on the second phase of the Perfil-es study, where sociodemographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients starting NNRTI- or PI/r-based regimens in order to identify factors that could influence the choice of initial ART. Patients' characteristics were compared by both bivariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 642 patients were evaluated. The main transmission group was men who have sex with men (MSM) (48%), and 24% of patients were coinfected with hepatitis B or C. Patients with cardiovascular risk accounted for 56%, and 15% had a neuropsychiatric history. Anxiolytics (29%), antidepressants (18%) and methadone (18%) were the most frequent concomitant medications. The use of PI/r-based regimens was more frequent in older patients, childbearing potential women patients coinfected with hepatitis B or C, and those with cardiovascular risk and a neuropsychiatric history. The presence of a neuropsychiatric disorder (OR: 1.912; CI 95%: 1.146-3.191; p < .05) and the use of concomitant medication (OR: 1.736; CI 95%: 1.204-2.502; p < .01) were identified as independent factors associated with the selection of PI/r-based regimens. MSM sexual conduct was the only independent factor related to the selection of NNRTI-based ART (OR: 0.699; CI 95%: 0.504-0.970; p < .05). Neither the physicians' characteristics nor the geographical area where HIV patients were attended influenced the choice of ART. In conclusion, patients' comorbidity, pregnancy potential and lifestyle seem to influence the choice of ART. Neuropsychiatric comorbidity and concomitant medication, mainly related to this condition, appear to be associated with the use of PI/r-based initial ART while MSM seem more likely to receive NNRTI-based regimens in Spain.

摘要

Perfil-es研究表明,虽然在初治的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者中,更常使用基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)的初始抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART),但在处于感染晚期或基线病毒载量高的患者中,基于利托那韦增强蛋白酶抑制剂(PI/r)的方案是首选。本分析聚焦于Perfil-es研究的第二阶段,回顾性收集了开始基于NNRTI或PI/r方案治疗的患者的社会人口统计学和临床数据,以确定可能影响初始ART选择的因素。通过双变量和多变量分析对患者特征进行了比较。共评估了642例患者。主要传播群体是男男性行为者(MSM)(48%),24%的患者合并感染乙型或丙型肝炎。有心血管风险的患者占56%,15%有神经精神病史。最常使用的合并用药是抗焦虑药(29%)、抗抑郁药(18%)和美沙酮(18%)。在老年患者、合并感染乙型或丙型肝炎且有生育潜力的女性患者,以及有心血管风险和神经精神病史的患者中,更常使用基于PI/r的方案。神经精神障碍的存在(比值比:1.912;95%置信区间:1.146 - 3.191;p < 0.05)和合并用药的使用(比值比:1.736;95%置信区间:1.204 - 2.502;p < 0.01)被确定为与选择基于PI/r方案相关的独立因素。MSM性行为是与选择基于NNRTI的ART相关的唯一独立因素(比值比:0.699;95%置信区间:0.504 - 0.970;p < 0.05)。医生的特征以及HIV患者接受治疗的地理区域均未影响ART的选择。总之,患者的合并症、妊娠可能性和生活方式似乎会影响ART的选择。神经精神合并症和合并用药(主要与此情况相关)似乎与使用基于PI/r的初始ART有关,而在西班牙,MSM似乎更有可能接受基于NNRTI的方案。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the preference between NNRTIs and PIs for the initial treatment of HIV infection: Perfil-es study.与在HIV感染初始治疗中选择非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)和蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)的偏好相关的社会人口统计学和临床因素:Perfil-es研究
AIDS Care. 2016 Oct;28(10):1321-6. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1173640. Epub 2016 May 3.
2
Effectiveness of boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in HIV type 1-infected patients who experienced virological failure with NNRTI-based antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited setting.在资源有限的环境中,基于增强型蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗方案对接受基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒治疗后出现病毒学失败的1型人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者的疗效。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2010 Feb;26(2):139-48. doi: 10.1089/aid.2009.0125.
3
[Initial antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Spain: Decisions made in relation to particular immunovirological characteristics (PERFIL-es study)].[西班牙人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者的初始抗逆转录病毒治疗:根据特定免疫病毒学特征做出的决策(PERFIL-es研究)]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014 Feb;32(2):93-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
4
Comparative Impact of Suppressive Antiretroviral Regimens on the CD4/CD8 T-Cell Ratio: A Cohort Study.抑制性抗逆转录病毒治疗方案对CD4/CD8 T细胞比值的比较影响:一项队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3108. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003108.
5
Treatment limitations imposed by antiretroviral drug resistance mutations: implication for choices of first line regimens in resource-limited settings.抗逆转录病毒药物耐药性突变带来的治疗限制:对资源有限环境下一线治疗方案选择的影响。
HIV Med. 2012 Mar;13(3):141-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00950.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
6
Influence of concomitant antiretroviral therapy on the rate of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus/HIV-coinfected patients.抗逆转录病毒疗法对丙型肝炎病毒/艾滋病病毒合并感染患者接受聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林治疗后持续病毒学应答率的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Dec;60(6):1347-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm373. Epub 2007 Oct 14.
7
Influence of antiretroviral therapy on oxidative stress and cardiovascular risk: a prospective cross-sectional study in HIV-infected patients.抗逆转录病毒疗法对氧化应激和心血管风险的影响:一项针对HIV感染患者的前瞻性横断面研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1448-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.025.
8
Which antiretrovirals should be prescribed as first-line treatments? Changes over the past 10 years in France.哪些抗逆转录病毒药物应作为一线治疗药物?法国过去 10 年的变化。
Med Mal Infect. 2019 Jun;49(4):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
9
Predictors of clinically significant drug-drug interactions among patients treated with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-, protease inhibitor-, and raltegravir-based antiretroviral regimens.非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂、蛋白酶抑制剂和拉替拉韦为基础的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案治疗的患者中具有临床意义的药物相互作用的预测因素。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;45(3):317-24. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P576. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
Long-term effectiveness of initiating non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- versus ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy: implications for first-line therapy choice in resource-limited settings.启动基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂与利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法的长期疗效:对资源有限环境中一线治疗选择的影响
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Aug 5;19(1):20978. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.20978. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice of the initial antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive individuals in the era of integrase inhibitors.整合酶抑制剂时代 HIV 阳性个体初始抗逆转录病毒治疗的选择。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221598. eCollection 2019.