Farooq Fizzah, Khan Robyna, Ahmed Aliya
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):248-52. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179450.
Assessment of patient satisfaction is an important tool for monitoring the quality of care in hospitals. The aim of this survey was to develop a reliable tool to assess patient satisfaction with acute pain management service (APMS) and identify variables affecting this so that care can be improved.
A questionnaire was developed and administered to patients after being discharged from APMS care by an unbiased person. Data collected from record included patient demographics, surgical procedure, analgesic modality, co-analgesics and dynamic and static pain scores. Questions included pain expected and pain experienced, APMS response time, quality of pain relief with treatment, professionalism of APMS team, overall experience of pain relief and choosing/suggesting same modality for themselves/family/friends again. Five-point Likert scale was used for most of the options. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19.
Frequency and percentages were computed for qualitative observation and presented on pie chart and histogram. Seventy-one per cent patients expected severe pain while 43% actually experienced it. About 79.4% would choose same analgesia modality in future for self/family/friends. Ninety-nine per cent found APMS staff courteous and professional. About 89% rated their experience of pain management as excellent to very good.
The survey of patients' satisfaction to monitor the quality of care provided by APMS provided positive inputs on its role. This also helps to identify areas requiring improvement in care and as a tool to gauge the quality of care.
患者满意度评估是监测医院护理质量的重要工具。本次调查的目的是开发一种可靠的工具来评估患者对急性疼痛管理服务(APMS)的满意度,并确定影响满意度的变量,以便改进护理。
设计了一份问卷,由一名公正的人员在患者出院后对其进行调查。从记录中收集的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、手术过程、镇痛方式、辅助镇痛药以及动态和静态疼痛评分。问题包括预期疼痛和实际经历的疼痛、APMS响应时间、治疗后的疼痛缓解质量、APMS团队的专业程度、疼痛缓解的总体体验以及是否会再次为自己/家人/朋友选择/推荐相同的镇痛方式。大多数选项采用五点李克特量表。使用SPSS 19进行统计分析。
计算定性观察的频率和百分比,并以饼图和直方图呈现。71%的患者预期会有剧烈疼痛,而实际经历剧烈疼痛的患者为43%。约79.4%的患者未来会为自己/家人/朋友选择相同的镇痛方式。99%的患者认为APMS工作人员礼貌且专业。约89%的患者将他们的疼痛管理体验评为优秀或非常好。
对患者满意度的调查以监测APMS提供的护理质量,为其作用提供了积极的反馈。这也有助于确定护理中需要改进的领域,并作为衡量护理质量的工具。