• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性疼痛服务能否改善下肢手术患者对术后疼痛管理的认知?一项前瞻性对照非随机研究。

Does an acute pain service improve the perception of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lower limb surgery? A prospective controlled non-randomized study.

作者信息

Mitra Sukanya, Jain Kompal, Singh Jasveer, Jindal Swati, Saxena Puja, Singh Manpreet, Saroa Richa, Ahuja Vanita, Kang Jannat, Garg Sudhir

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):187-194. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_104_19. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_104_19
PMID:33013033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7480304/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

An acute pain service (APS) has been running in our institute since April 2013 and is managed by the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. However, it is not clear to what extent the patients feel benefited from the APS. The aim of the study was to compare the perception of postoperative pain management in patients receiving care under APS with those receiving routine postoperative pain relief following lower limb surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, hospital-based, controlled non-randomized study. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I-III patients with age 18-75 years undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery were prospectively recruited into APS (index group) or routine postoperative care (control group) ( = 55 each). Postoperatively, American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised (APS-POQ-R) and Short Form (SF-12) were used to evaluate the outcome of postoperative pain management at 24 h and health-related quality of life after 4 weeks respectively.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic data. Patients in the index group had statistically significant better perception of care than the control group. Index group scored significantly higher than control group on median patient satisfaction score (9; interquartile range [IQR] [7-10] vs. 5 [3-6]; < 0.001). In index group, there was significant reduction of worst pain in first 24 h along with decreased frequency of severe pain.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of acute pain service plays an important role in improving the quality of postoperative pain relief, perception of care, and patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景与目的

自2013年4月起,我院一直设有急性疼痛服务(APS),由麻醉与重症监护科管理。然而,目前尚不清楚患者从APS中受益的程度。本研究的目的是比较接受APS护理的患者与接受下肢手术后常规术后疼痛缓解的患者对术后疼痛管理的认知。

材料与方法

这是一项基于医院的前瞻性对照非随机研究。前瞻性招募年龄在18 - 75岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I - III级且接受下肢骨科手术的患者进入APS组(指数组)或常规术后护理组(对照组)(每组n = 55)。术后,分别使用美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷修订版(APS - POQ - R)和简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)在术后24小时评估术后疼痛管理的结果,并在4周后评估与健康相关的生活质量。

结果

两组在人口统计学数据方面具有可比性。指数组患者对护理的认知在统计学上显著优于对照组。指数组患者满意度中位数得分显著高于对照组(9;四分位间距[IQR][7 - 10]对比5[3 - 6];P < 0.001)。在指数组中,术后首24小时内最严重疼痛明显减轻,且重度疼痛频率降低。

结论

实施急性疼痛服务在改善术后疼痛缓解质量、护理认知和患者满意度方面发挥着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f86/7480304/878c301d53db/JOACP-36-187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f86/7480304/49fdb0a97955/JOACP-36-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f86/7480304/878c301d53db/JOACP-36-187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f86/7480304/49fdb0a97955/JOACP-36-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f86/7480304/878c301d53db/JOACP-36-187-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does an acute pain service improve the perception of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lower limb surgery? A prospective controlled non-randomized study.急性疼痛服务能否改善下肢手术患者对术后疼痛管理的认知?一项前瞻性对照非随机研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):187-194. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_104_19. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.采用验证性因子分析评估修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷在妇科术后患者中的结构效度。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x.
3
Evaluating patient outcomes in postoperative pain management according to the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).根据修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R)评估术后疼痛管理中的患者结局。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Oct;73:151734. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151734. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
5
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).《美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷修订版》(APS-POQ-R)结构的跨文化研究。
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
Comparison of Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes in the United States and China.中美术后疼痛管理结局比较。
Clin Nurs Res. 2021 Nov;30(8):1290-1300. doi: 10.1177/10547738211012832. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure.利用美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-RED)增强急诊科的疼痛护理:验证一种患者报告结局测量工具。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Mar 5;13(1):e002295. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002295.
8
The impact of early postoperative pain on health-related quality of life.术后早期疼痛对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Pain Pract. 2013 Sep;13(7):515-23. doi: 10.1111/papr.12026. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
ASSIST - Patient satisfaction survey in postoperative pain management from Indian subcontinent.ASSIST - 印度次大陆术后疼痛管理患者满意度调查
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):40-47. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_245_16.
10
A Dedicated Acute Pain Service Is Associated With Reduced Postoperative Opioid Requirements in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.专门的急性疼痛服务与细胞减灭术联合腹腔内热化疗患者术后阿片类药物需求减少相关。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1044-1050. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003342.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals.匈牙利医院的急性疼痛服务与疼痛相关的患者报告结局
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Mar 12;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00373-z.
2
Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide.围手术期疼痛管理与阿片类药物管理:实用指南。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;9(3):333. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030333.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute pain service: Round the clock vigilance.急性疼痛服务:全天候监护。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;62(7):491-492. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_471_18.
2
Advances in regional anaesthesia: A review of current practice, newer techniques and outcomes.区域麻醉的进展:当前实践、新技术及结果综述
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):94-102. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_433_17.
3
A survey of acute pain services in the UK.英国急性疼痛服务调查。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Oct;72(10):1237-1242. doi: 10.1111/anae.14007.
4
Patient Perception of Acute Pain Management: Data from Three Tertiary Care Hospitals.患者对急性疼痛管理的认知:来自三家三级护理医院的数据。
Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:7459360. doi: 10.1155/2017/7459360. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
A multicentre survey of the current acute post-operative pain management practices in tertiary care teaching hospitals in Maharashtra.一项关于马哈拉施特拉邦三级护理教学医院当前急性术后疼痛管理实践的多中心调查。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Mar;61(3):215-224. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_506_16.
6
Assessment of patient satisfaction with acute pain management service: Monitoring quality of care in clinical setting.急性疼痛管理服务患者满意度评估:临床环境中护理质量监测
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):248-52. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179450.
7
The experience of setting up a resident-managed Acute Pain Service: a descriptive study.建立住院医师管理的急性疼痛服务的经验:一项描述性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Feb 22;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0179-0.
8
Acute pain services in India: A glimpse of the current scenario.印度的急性疼痛服务:当前状况一瞥。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):554-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.169088.
9
A follow-up on Acute Pain Services in Germany compared to international survey data.德国急性疼痛服务与国际调查数据的对比随访。
Eur J Pain. 2016 Jul;20(6):874-83. doi: 10.1002/ejp.812. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
Acute pain service: the journey in a developing country setting.急性疼痛服务:在发展中国家环境中的历程。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Jan;59(1):98-106. doi: 10.1111/aas.12434. Epub 2014 Oct 28.