Baker Dixie B, Kaye Jane, Terry Sharon F
Martin, Blanck & Associates.
Oxford University.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 31;4(2):1207. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1207. eCollection 2016.
Individuals have a moral claim to be involved in the governance of their personal data. Individuals' rights include privacy, autonomy, and the ability to choose for themselves how they want to manage risk, consistent with their own personal values and life situations. The Fair Information Practices principles (FIPPs) offer a framework for governance. Privacy-enhancing technology that complies with applicable law and FIPPs offers a dynamic governance tool for enabling the fair and open use of individual's personal data.
Any governance model must protect against the risks posed by data misuse. Individual perceptions of risks are a subjective function involving individuals' values toward self, family, and society, their perceptions of trust, and their cognitive decision-making skills.
Individual privacy protections and individuals' right to choose are codified in the HIPAA Privacy Rule, which attempts to strike a balance between the dual goals of information flow and privacy protection. The choices most commonly given individuals regarding the use of their health information are binary ("yes" or "no") and immutable. Recent federal recommendations and law recognize the need for granular, dynamic choices.
Individuals expect that they will govern the use of their own health and genomic data. Failure to build and maintain individuals' trust increases the likelihood that they will refuse to grant permission to access or use their data. The "no surprises principle" asserts that an individual's personal information should never be collected, used, transmitted, or disclosed in a way that would surprise the individual were she to learn about it.
The FIPPs provide a powerful framework for enabling data sharing and use, while maintaining trust. We introduce the eight FIPPs adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services, and provide examples of their interpretation and implementation.
Privacy risk and health risk can be reduced by giving consumers control, autonomy, and transparency, and by engaging them in managing their own health. Explicit "consent" may not always be necessary - the FIPPs offer multiple ways to engender trust and avoid surprises.
个人在其个人数据治理方面拥有道德诉求。个人权利包括隐私、自主权,以及根据自身个人价值观和生活状况自行选择如何管理风险的能力。公平信息实践原则(FIPPs)提供了一个治理框架。符合适用法律和FIPPs的隐私增强技术为实现个人数据的公平和开放使用提供了一个动态治理工具。
任何治理模式都必须防范数据滥用带来的风险。个人对风险的认知是一种主观功能,涉及个人对自我、家庭和社会的价值观、他们的信任认知以及他们的认知决策技能。
《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则将部分治理权交到个人手中:个人隐私保护和个人选择权在《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则中得到编纂,该规则试图在信息流和隐私保护这两个双重目标之间取得平衡。关于个人健康信息使用最常见的选择是二元的(“是”或“否”)且不可更改。最近的联邦建议和法律认识到需要有细致的、动态的选择。
个人期望他们能治理自己健康和基因组数据的使用。未能建立和维护个人信任会增加他们拒绝授予访问或使用其数据许可的可能性。“无意外原则”主张,个人的个人信息绝不应该以一种如果她得知会让她感到意外的方式被收集、使用、传输或披露。
FIPPs为实现数据共享和使用提供了一个强大框架,同时维持信任。我们介绍了美国卫生与公众服务部采用的八项FIPPs,并提供了它们的解释和实施示例。
通过给予消费者控制权、自主权和透明度,并让他们参与管理自己的健康,可以降低隐私风险和健康风险。明确的“同意”可能并非总是必要的——FIPPs提供了多种建立信任和避免意外情况的方式。