Lahmer Tobias, Rasch Sebastian, Schnappauf Christopher, Beitz Analena, Schmid Roland M, Huber Wolfgang
II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Mycopathologia. 2016 Aug;181(7-8):505-11. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0011-x. Epub 2016 May 3.
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is an important cause of morbidity/mortality in critically ill patients with hematological malignancies. New diagnosis strategies include the noninvasive biomarkers 1,3-beta-D-glucan (BDG) and serum galactomannan (GM).
For early detection of IPA, we compared BDG Fungitell assay with GM Platelia assay.
Twenty-two out of 30 patients (74 %) had elevated BDG levels (mean 306 pg/ml) beyond the cutoff of 80 pg/ml. GM levels were elevated in only 3 patients (10 %) over the ODI cutoff of >0.5. Following the BDG/GM and microbiological findings, 10 (34 %) cases were classified as probable IPA and 12 (40 %) as possible IPA. Eight (26 %) were classified as no IPA. An overall sensitivity of 90 % (95 % CI 86-96 %) and specificity of 85 % (95 % CI 79-86 %) was found for the BDG Fungitell assay in IPA. In contrast, an overall sensitivity of 30 % (95 % CI 26-38 %) and specificity of 98 % (95 % CI 94-100 %) was found for the GM Platelia assay. A false-negative rate of 70 % for probable IPA and 85 % for probable/possible IPA was detected for GM. The false-negative rate for BDG was 0 % in cases of probable IPA and 45 % in cases of possible cases.
BDG is a sensitive marker for patients' surveillance at risk of IPA. In patients with hematological malignancies and septic shock, early diagnosis of IPA might be significantly improved by BDG compared to GM, also considering that BDG has the advantage of detecting fungal diseases other than IPA.
侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)是血液系统恶性肿瘤重症患者发病和死亡的重要原因。新的诊断策略包括非侵入性生物标志物1,3-β-D-葡聚糖(BDG)和血清半乳甘露聚糖(GM)。
为了早期检测IPA,我们比较了BDG真菌检测法和GM胶体金检测法。
30例患者中有22例(74%)的BDG水平升高(平均306 pg/ml),超过了80 pg/ml的临界值。GM水平仅在3例患者(10%)中升高,超过ODI临界值>0.5。根据BDG/GM和微生物学检查结果,10例(34%)病例被分类为可能的IPA,12例(40%)为可能的IPA。8例(26%)被分类为无IPA。BDG真菌检测法对IPA的总体敏感性为90%(95%CI 86-96%),特异性为85%(95%CI 79-86%)。相比之下,GM胶体金检测法的总体敏感性为30%(95%CI 26-38%),特异性为98%(95%CI 94-100%)。GM检测可能的IPA的假阴性率为70%,可能/可能IPA的假阴性率为85%。BDG在可能的IPA病例中的假阴性率为0%,在可能病例中的假阴性率为45%。
BDG是监测IPA风险患者的敏感标志物。在血液系统恶性肿瘤和感染性休克患者中,与GM相比,BDG可能显著改善IPA的早期诊断,同时考虑到BDG具有检测除IPA以外的其他真菌疾病的优势。