Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Masaryk University and University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75132-3.
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) early diagnosis improves hematological patient survival. Non-culture-based methods may reduce diagnostic time to identify IFD. As complex data on the value of 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) compared to serum for the most frequent invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) diagnosis are scarce, particularly including evaluation of potential factors adversely affecting BDG assay, we provided prospective single-center analysis evaluating 172 episodes of pulmonary infiltrates with BDG detection in BALF and serum samples collected in parallel among hematological patients from 2006 to 2015. Proven and probable IPA were documented in 13.4% of the episodes. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative predictive value (PPV; NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the BDG assay using standard (80 pg/ml) cut-off for BALF were: 56.5%; 83.2%; 34.2%; 92.5%, and 6.5, respectively, and for serum were: 56.5%; 82.6%; 33.3%; 92.5%, and 6.2, respectively. The same BDG assay parameters employing a calculated optimal cut-off for BALF (39 pg/ml) were: 78.3%; 72.5%; 30.5%; 95.6%, and 9.5, respectively; and for serum (40 pg/ml) were: 73.9%; 69.1%; 27.0%; 94.5%, and 6.3, respectively. While identifying acceptable SEN, SPE, and DOR, yet low PPV of both BALF and serum BDG assay for IPA diagnosis, neither the combination of both materials nor the new optimal BDG cut-off led to significant test quality improvement. Absolute neutrophil count and aspirated BALF volume with a significant trend affected BDG assay performance. The BDG test did not outperform galactomannan assay.
侵袭性真菌病 (IFD) 的早期诊断可提高血液病患者的生存率。非培养为基础的方法可以减少诊断时间,以确定 IFD。由于关于支气管肺泡灌洗液 (BALF) 中 1,3-β-D-葡聚糖 (BDG) 相对于血清用于最常见的侵袭性肺曲霉病 (IPA) 诊断的价值的复杂数据很少,特别是包括评估可能影响 BDG 检测的潜在因素,我们提供了一项前瞻性单中心分析,评估了 2006 年至 2015 年期间在血液病患者中采集的并行 BALF 和血清样本中 172 例肺部浸润患者的 BDG 检测。13.4%的病例中记录了确诊和可能 IPA。BDG 检测的敏感性 (SEN)、特异性 (SPE)、阳性和阴性预测值 (PPV; NPV) 以及诊断比值比 (DOR) 使用 BALF 的标准 (80 pg/ml) 截止值分别为:56.5%;83.2%;34.2%;92.5%,6.5。对于血清分别为:56.5%;82.6%;33.3%;92.5%,6.2。采用 BALF 计算的最佳截止值 (39 pg/ml) 的相同 BDG 检测参数为:78.3%;72.5%;30.5%;95.6%,9.5;对于血清 (40 pg/ml) 为:73.9%;69.1%;27.0%;94.5%,6.3。虽然确定了可接受的 SEN、SPE 和 DOR,但 BALF 和血清 BDG 检测 IPA 诊断的 PPV 较低,无论是两种材料的组合还是新的最佳 BDG 截止值都没有导致测试质量的显著提高。绝对中性粒细胞计数和抽吸 BALF 量呈显著趋势影响 BDG 检测性能。BDG 检测并未优于半乳甘露聚糖检测。