Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Department of Medicine, St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.041. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
Seroma formation in breast cancer patients who have undergone axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a source of significant discomfort and morbidity. We aimed to ascertain seroma incidence after ALND, when Harmonic Focus (HF) scalpel is used for dissection instead of conventional diathermy (CD).
METHODS(AND PATIENTS): This retrospective study was carried out in a single hospital over 6 years. Patients were allocated into HF group (HFG) or CD group (CDG). Seroma volume, hospital stay, and complications were evaluated.
Of 94 patients, 42 were in the HFG and 52 in the CDG. Two day median seroma volume was 205 ml (IQR 95-265) for HF, and 227.5 ml (IQR 149-385) for CD. The total median seroma output was 270 ml (IQR 160-478) for HF, and 385 ml (IQR 220-558) for CD. No statistically significant differences between HFG and CDG were identified in these data, as well as patient demographics, operative time, and complication rates. Duration of surgery >2.5 h increased seroma formation (p < 0.001). Mastectomy and ALND increased seroma formation compared to wide local excision (WLE) and ALND (p < 0.05). Nodal involvement, number of lymph nodes resected, and extra nodal spread did not influence seroma formation.
DISCUSSION(AND CONCLUSION): In our hands, HF use was not superior to CD in limiting seroma formation in ALND for breast cancer. Increased seroma formation in surgeries >2.5 h in duration is commensurate with surgeries involving mastectomy and ALND (>2.5 h in our study), which entails greater and sustained tissue and lymphovascular trauma.
乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)后形成血清肿是造成明显不适和发病率的原因。我们旨在确定使用 Harmonic Focus(HF)刀进行解剖代替传统电烙术(CD)时 ALND 后的血清肿发生率。
方法(和患者):这项回顾性研究在一家医院进行了 6 年。患者被分配到 HF 组(HFG)或 CD 组(CDG)。评估血清肿量、住院时间和并发症。
94 例患者中,42 例在 HFG,52 例在 CDG。HF 组的 2 天中位数血清肿量为 205ml(IQR 95-265),CD 组为 227.5ml(IQR 149-385)。HF 组的总中位数血清肿输出量为 270ml(IQR 160-478),CD 组为 385ml(IQR 220-558)。这些数据中,HFG 和 CDG 之间在患者人口统计学、手术时间和并发症发生率方面没有统计学差异。手术时间>2.5 小时会增加血清肿形成(p<0.001)。与广泛局部切除术(WLE)和 ALND 相比,乳房切除术和 ALND 增加了血清肿形成(p<0.05)。淋巴结受累、切除的淋巴结数量和淋巴结外扩散均不影响血清肿形成。
讨论(和结论):在我们手中,HF 的使用并不能优于 CD 来限制乳腺癌 ALND 中的血清肿形成。持续时间>2.5 小时的手术中血清肿形成增加与我们研究中涉及乳房切除术和 ALND 的手术(>2.5 小时)相一致,这需要更大和持续的组织和淋巴血管创伤。