Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), School of Medicine, University of Padua, Padova, Italy,
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Nov;142(2):399-404. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2746-0. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
In the sentinel node era, axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer (BC) is required much less frequently than in the past. However, complications, such as prolonged drainage output and seroma formation, are still observed. Harmonic dissection devices (HDDs) are widely used in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery to reduce collateral damage during tissue dissection, but its usefulness in breast surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HDDs compared to that of conventional dissection in performing ALND. One hundred thirty-nine women (median age 61 years, range 34-71 years) with confirmed pT1-2 primary infiltrating ductal BC undergoing curative surgery were enrolled in the study. The population was prospectively randomized between two age- and stage-matched arms: group A (cases)-68 (48.9 %) patients (HDD technique), versus group B (controls)-71 (51.1 %) patients (conventional technique). In group B, skin flaps were obtained using a scalpel, scissors, and electrocautery which was never used for ALND. In group A, for each operation time, the HDDs were used exclusively. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage output were (A vs. B) 95 ± 22 versus 109 ± 25 min, 56 ± 12 versus 86 ± 15 mL, and 412 ± 83 versus 456 ± 69 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Twenty-nine (20.9 %) patients developed an axillary seroma: 9 (13.2 %) and 20 (28.2 %) for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.030). Our study confirms that in patients with BC requiring ALND the use of HDDs is more time efficient than conventional surgery, and reduces intraoperative bleeding, the amount of drainage, and the risk of seroma formation. These results may lead to several short- and long-term advantages. Thus, a careful evaluation of the cost-benefits of nontraditional tools, such as HDDs, should be performed in all patients undergoing modified radical or partial mastectomy and ALND for BC.
在前哨淋巴结时代,乳腺癌(BC)的腋窝清扫(ALND)的频率比过去低得多。然而,仍然存在并发症,如引流量延长和血清肿形成。谐波解剖设备(HDD)广泛应用于腹腔镜和微创手术中,以减少组织解剖过程中的附带损伤,但在乳房手术中的用途尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 HDD 与传统解剖术在 ALND 中的疗效。
将 139 名(中位年龄 61 岁,范围 34-71 岁)经证实患有原发性浸润性导管癌(pT1-2)的女性患者纳入研究。该人群前瞻性随机分为两组:A 组(病例)-68 例(48.9%)患者(HDD 技术),B 组(对照)-71 例(51.1%)患者(常规技术)。在 B 组中,使用手术刀、剪刀和电灼术获取皮瓣,从未在 ALND 中使用过。在 A 组中,对于每次手术时间,都专门使用 HDD。
(A 组与 B 组相比)手术时间、术中出血量和引流量分别为 95 ± 22 分钟对 109 ± 25 分钟、56 ± 12 毫升对 86 ± 15 毫升、412 ± 83 毫升对 456 ± 69 毫升(p < 0.01)。29 例(20.9%)患者发生腋窝血清肿:A 组 9 例(13.2%),B 组 20 例(28.2%)(p = 0.030)。
我们的研究证实,在需要 ALND 的 BC 患者中,与传统手术相比,使用 HDD 更有效率,可减少术中出血、引流量和血清肿形成的风险。这些结果可能带来一些短期和长期的优势。因此,在所有接受改良根治术或部分乳房切除术和 ALND 的 BC 患者中,都应仔细评估非传统工具(如 HDD)的成本效益。