Suppr超能文献

超声刀与高频电刀在改良根治性乳房切除术的应用比较:一项随机对照研究。

Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery dissection in modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):808-14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3369-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that the use of a harmonic scalpel increases operative time but results in less estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, drainage volume, and duration of surgery, as well as fewer complications, such as flap necrosis, seroma, and surgical site infection (SSI), than electrocautery.

METHODS

This parallel-group, single-institution blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at the department of surgery of our institute between April 2010 and July 2011. Women undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated to either harmonic dissection (n = 76) or electrocautery (n = 76).

RESULTS

Both the groups were comparable for baseline variables with age of 50.5 ± 12.2 and 48.5 ± 14.5 years in the harmonic and electrocautery groups, respectively. Harmonic dissection yielded better outcomes compared to electrocautery with lower estimated blood loss (100 ± 62 vs. 182 ± 92, p < 0.001), less drain volume (631 ± 275 ml vs. 1035 ± 413 ml, p < 0.001), fewer drain days (12 ± 3 vs. 17 ± 4, p < 0.001), less seroma formation (21.3 vs. 33.3 %, p = 0.071), and less postoperative pain [median (interquartile range) 2 (2-2) vs. 3 (3-4), p < 0.001], whereas mean operative time (191 ± 44 vs. 187 ± 36 min, p = 0.49) and SSI (0 vs. 4 %, p = 0.122) did not differ. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, harmonic dissection was associated with lower risk of significant postoperative pain [adjusted relative risk 0.028 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.004-0.2)] and overall complications [adjusted relative risk 0.47, (95 % CI 0.26-0.86)]. On multiple linear regression, duration of drains in the harmonic dissection group was 4.5 days less than electrocautery (r2 = 0.28, β = 11.8, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The harmonic scalpel significantly reduces postoperative discomfort and morbidity to the patient without increasing operating time. We thus recommend preferential use of harmonic dissection in modified radical mastectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01587248).

摘要

目的

验证使用超声刀比电刀能减少手术时间,但增加失血量、术后疼痛、引流量和手术时间,以及减少皮瓣坏死、血清肿和手术部位感染(SSI)等并发症的假设。

方法

本研究为单中心、平行组、双盲随机对照试验,于 2010 年 4 月至 2011 年 7 月在我院外科进行。接受改良根治性乳房切除术的女性被随机分配到超声刀组(n = 76)或电刀组(n = 76)。

结果

两组患者的基线变量年龄无差异,超声刀组和电刀组分别为 50.5 ± 12.2 岁和 48.5 ± 14.5 岁。与电刀相比,超声刀组的结果更好,失血量更少(100 ± 62 比 182 ± 92,p < 0.001),引流量更少(631 ± 275 ml 比 1035 ± 413 ml,p < 0.001),引流天数更少(12 ± 3 比 17 ± 4,p < 0.001),血清肿形成更少(21.3% 比 33.3%,p = 0.071),术后疼痛更少[中位数(四分位数范围)2(2-2)比 3(3-4),p < 0.001],而平均手术时间(191 ± 44 比 187 ± 36 min,p = 0.49)和 SSI(0 比 4%,p = 0.122)无差异。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,超声刀与术后疼痛显著降低的风险较低相关[校正相对风险 0.028(95%置信区间(CI)0.004-0.2)]和总并发症[校正相对风险 0.47(95%CI 0.26-0.86)]。在多元线性回归中,超声刀组引流时间比电刀组少 4.5 天(r2 = 0.28,β = 11.8,p < 0.001)。

结论

超声刀可显著减轻患者术后不适和发病率,而不增加手术时间。因此,我们建议在改良根治性乳房切除术中优先使用超声刀。(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01587248)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验