Caltran Marina P, Freitas Noélle O, Dantas Rosana A S, Farina Jayme Adriano, Rossi Lidia A
Master of Nursing in Science at University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Interunit Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo School of Nursing and University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Burns. 2016 Sep;42(6):1331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 May 1.
Methodological study that aimed to adapt the Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP) into Brazilian Portuguese language and to assess the validity, the reliability and the dimensionality of the adapted version in a sample of Brazilian burn victims.
We carried out the adaptation process according to the international literature. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the adapted version of SWAP scores with depression (Beck Depression Index), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), health-related quality of Life (Short Form Health Survey-36) and health status of burn victims (Burn Specific Health Scale-Revised), and with gender, total body surface area burned, and visibility of the scars. We tested dimensionality using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the reliability by means of Cronbach's alpha.
Participants were 106 adult burned patients. The correlations between the Brazilian version of the SWAP scores and the correlated construct measures varied from moderate to strong (r=.30-.77). The participants who perceived their burn sequelae was visible reported being more dissatisfied with their body image than the participants who answered that their scars would not be visible (p<.001). Cronbach's alpha for the adapted version was 0.88 and the item-total correlation varied from moderate to strong (r=.35-.73). The EFA resulted in three factors with a total explained variance percentage of 63.2%.
The Brazilian version of the SWAP was valid and reliable for use with Brazilian burn victims.
进行一项方法学研究,旨在将外貌满意度量表(SWAP)改编为巴西葡萄牙语,并在巴西烧伤患者样本中评估改编版本的有效性、可靠性和维度。
我们根据国际文献进行改编过程。通过将SWAP分数的改编版本与抑郁(贝克抑郁量表)、自尊(罗森伯格自尊量表)、健康相关生活质量(简短健康调查问卷-36)和烧伤患者的健康状况(烧伤特异性健康量表-修订版)以及性别、烧伤总面积和疤痕可见性进行关联,来评估结构效度。我们使用探索性因素分析(EFA)测试维度,并通过克朗巴赫α系数测试可靠性。
参与者为106名成年烧伤患者。巴西版SWAP分数与相关结构测量之间的相关性从中度到高度不等(r = 0.30 - 0.77)。认为自己烧伤后遗症可见的参与者报告对自己身体形象的不满程度高于回答疤痕不可见的参与者(p < 0.001)。改编版本的克朗巴赫α系数为0.88,项目-总分相关性从中度到高度不等(r = 0.35 - 0.73)。EFA产生了三个因素,总解释方差百分比为63.2%。
巴西版的SWAP对巴西烧伤患者有效且可靠。