Freitas Noélle de Oliveira, Forero Carlos García, Caltran Marina Paes, Alonso Jordi, Dantas Rosana A Spadoti, Piccolo Monica Sarto, Farina Jayme Adriano, Lawrence John W, Rossi Lidia A
Inter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Health Services Research Unit, IMIM Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):e0190747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190747. eCollection 2018.
Currently, there is no questionnaire to assess perceived stigmatization among people with visible differences in Brazil. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ), developed in the United States, is a valid instrument to assess the perception of stigmatizing behaviours among burn survivors. The objective of this cross-sectional and multicentre study was to assess the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PSQ in burn patients. A Brazilian version of the 21-item PSQ was answered by 240 adult burn patients, undergoing rehabilitation in two burns units in Brazil. We tested its construct validity by correlating PSQ scores with depression (Beck Depression Index-BDI) and self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale-RSE), as well as with two domains of the Revised Burn Specific Health Scale-BSHS-R: affect and body image, and interpersonal relationships. We used Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis (CIFA) to test whether the data fit a measurement model involving a three-factor structure (absence of friendly behaviour; confusing/staring behaviour; and hostile behaviour). We conducted Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) of the subscale in a 50% random sample of individuals (training split), treating items as ordinal categorical using unweighted least squares estimation. To assess discriminant validity of the Brazilian version of the PSQ we correlated PSQ scores with known groups (sex, total body surface area burned, and visibility of the scars) and assessed its reliability by means of Cronbach's alpha and using test-retest. Goodness-of-fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis were satisfactory for the PSQ, but not for the hostile behaviour subscale, which was modified to improve fit by eliminating 3 items. Cronbach's alphas for the PSQ refined version (PSQ-R) ranged from 0.65 to 0.88, with test-retest reliability 0.87 for the total score. The PSQ-R scores correlated strongly with depression (0.63; p < 0.001), self-esteem (-0.57; p < 0.001), body image (-0.63; p < 0.001), and interpersonal relationships (-0.55; p < 0.001). PSQ-R total scores were significantly lower for patients with visible scars (effect size = 0.51, p = 0.029). The PSQ-R showed reliability and validity comparable to the original version. However, the cross-cultural structure of the subscale "hostile behaviour" and sensitivity to change of the PSQ should be further evaluated.
目前,巴西尚无用于评估有明显差异人群所感知到的污名化的问卷。在美国开发的《感知污名化问卷》(PSQ)是评估烧伤幸存者对污名化行为感知的有效工具。这项横断面多中心研究的目的是评估巴西葡萄牙语版PSQ在烧伤患者中的因子结构、信度和效度。240名成年烧伤患者回答了巴西版的21项PSQ,这些患者正在巴西的两个烧伤科接受康复治疗。我们通过将PSQ得分与抑郁(贝克抑郁量表-BDI)、自尊(罗森伯格自尊量表-RSE)以及修订后的烧伤特异性健康量表-BSHS-R的两个领域:情感和身体形象以及人际关系进行关联,来测试其结构效度。我们使用验证性项目因子分析(CIFA)来测试数据是否符合一个包含三因素结构的测量模型(缺乏友好行为;令人困惑/盯着看的行为;以及敌对行为)。我们在50%的随机个体样本(训练分割)中对分量表进行探索性因子分析(EFA),使用未加权最小二乘法估计将项目视为有序分类变量。为了评估巴西版PSQ的区分效度,我们将PSQ得分与已知组(性别、烧伤的体表面积以及疤痕的可见度)进行关联,并通过克朗巴赫α系数和重测法来评估其信度。验证性因子分析的拟合优度指标对于PSQ来说是令人满意的,但对于敌对行为分量表则不然,该分量表通过剔除3个项目进行了修改以改善拟合度。PSQ修订版(PSQ-R)的克朗巴赫α系数范围为0.65至0.88,总分的重测信度为0.87。PSQ-R得分与抑郁(0.63;p < 0.001)、自尊(-0.57;p < 0.001)、身体形象(-0.63;p < 0.001)和人际关系(-0.55;p < 0.001)密切相关。有可见疤痕的患者的PSQ-R总分显著更低(效应量 = 0.51,p = 0.029)。PSQ-R显示出与原始版本相当的信度和效度。然而,“敌对行为”分量表的跨文化结构以及PSQ对变化的敏感性应进一步评估。