Mark Daniel B, Anstrom Kevin J, Sheng Shubin, Baloch Khaula N, Daniels Melanie R, Hoffmann Udo, Patel Manesh R, Cooper Lawton S, Lee Kerry L, Douglas Pamela S
From Outcomes Research Group (D.B.M., K.J.A., S.S., K.N.B., M.R.D.), Duke Clinical Research Institute (D.B.M., K.J.A., S.S., K.N.B., M.R.D., M.R.P., K.L.L., P.S.D.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H.); and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (L.S.C.).
Circulation. 2016 May 24;133(21):1995-2007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020259. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
The Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial found that initial use of ≥64 detector-row computed tomography angiography versus standard functional testing strategies (exercise ECG, stress nuclear methods, or stress echocardiography) did not improve clinical outcomes in 10 003 stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease requiring noninvasive testing. Symptom burden and quality of life (QOL) were major secondary outcomes.
We prospectively collected a battery of QOL instruments in 5985 patients at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. The prespecified primary QOL measures were the Duke Activity Status Index and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency and QOL scales. All comparisons were made as randomized. Baseline variables were well balanced in the 2982 patients randomly assigned to computed tomography angiography testing and the 3003 patients randomly assigned to functional testing. The Duke Activity Status Index improved substantially in both groups over the first 6 months following testing, but we found no evidence for a strategy-related difference (mean difference [anatomic - functional] at 24 months of follow-up, 0.1 [95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 1.1]). Similar results were seen for the Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale (mean difference at 24 months, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -0.8 to 0.4) and QOL scale (mean difference at 24 months, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -1.3 to 0.9). None of the secondary QOL measures showed a consistent strategy-related difference.
In symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease who required noninvasive testing, symptoms and QOL improved significantly. However, a strategy of initial anatomic testing, in comparison with functional testing, did not provide an incremental benefit for QOL over 2 years of follow-up.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.
胸痛评估前瞻性多中心成像研究(PROMISE)试验发现,在10003例需要进行无创检测的疑似冠心病稳定症状患者中,与标准功能测试策略(运动心电图、负荷核素检查或负荷超声心动图)相比,最初使用≥64排探测器的计算机断层扫描血管造影术并未改善临床结局。症状负担和生活质量(QOL)是主要的次要结局。
我们前瞻性地收集了5985例患者在基线时以及随机分组后6、12和24个月时的一系列生活质量评估工具。预先设定的主要生活质量指标为杜克活动状态指数以及西雅图心绞痛问卷频率和生活质量量表。所有比较均按照随机分组进行。在随机分配至计算机断层扫描血管造影术检测的2982例患者和随机分配至功能测试的3003例患者中,基线变量分布均衡。在检测后的前6个月内,两组的杜克活动状态指数均有显著改善,但我们未发现策略相关差异的证据(随访24个月时的平均差异[解剖学 - 功能测试]为0.1[95%置信区间,-0.9至1.1])。西雅图心绞痛问卷频率量表(24个月时的平均差异为-0.2;95%置信区间,-0.8至0.4)和生活质量量表(24个月时的平均差异为-0.2;95%置信区间,-1.3至0.9)也有类似结果。次要生活质量指标均未显示出与策略相关的一致差异。
在需要进行无创检测的疑似冠心病症状患者中,症状和生活质量有显著改善。然而,与功能测试相比,初始解剖学检测策略在2年的随访中并未为生活质量带来额外益处。