Mäkinen M, Castrén M, Nurmi J, Niemi-Murola L
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, Stenbäckinkatu 9, 00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical Science and Education and Section of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education and Section of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, Stenbäckinkatu 9, 00029 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 6300014 Helsinki, Finland.
Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:3701468. doi: 10.1155/2016/3701468. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Objectives. Studies have shown that healthcare personnel hesitate to perform defibrillation due to individual or organisational attitudes. We aimed to assess trainers' attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation (CPR-D), Current Care Guidelines, and associated training. Methods. A questionnaire was distributed to CPR trainers attending seminars in Finland (N = 185) focusing on the updated national Current Care Guidelines 2011. The questions were answered using Likert scale (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). Factor loading of the questionnaire was made using maximum likelihood analysis and varimax rotation. Seven scales were constructed (Hesitation, Nurse's Role, Nontechnical Skill, Usefulness, Restrictions, Personal, and Organisation). Cronbach's alphas were 0.92-0.51. Statistics were Student's t-test, ANOVA, stepwise regression analysis, and Pearson Correlation. Results. The questionnaire was returned by 124/185, 67% CPR trainers, of whom two-thirds felt that their undergraduate training in CPR-D had not been adequate. Satisfaction with undergraduate defibrillation training correlated with the Nontechnical Skills scale (p < 0.01). Participants scoring high on Hesitation scale (p < 0.01) were less confident about their Nurse's Role (p < 0.01) and Nontechnical Skills (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Quality of undergraduate education affects the work of CPR trainers and some feel uncertain of defibrillation. The train-the-trainers courses and undergraduate medical education should focus more on practical scenarios with defibrillators and nontechnical skills.
目标。研究表明,由于个人或组织态度,医护人员在进行除颤时会有所犹豫。我们旨在评估培训师对心肺复苏和除颤(CPR-D)、现行护理指南及相关培训的态度。方法。向参加芬兰研讨会的CPR培训师(N = 185)发放问卷,该研讨会聚焦于2011年更新的国家现行护理指南。问题采用李克特量表作答(1 = 完全不同意,7 = 完全同意)。问卷的因子负荷采用最大似然分析和方差最大化旋转法确定。构建了七个量表(犹豫、护士角色、非技术技能、有用性、限制、个人和组织)。克朗巴哈系数为0.92 - 0.51。统计方法采用学生t检验、方差分析、逐步回归分析和皮尔逊相关分析。结果。185名培训师中有124名(67%)回复了问卷,其中三分之二的人认为他们在CPR-D方面的本科培训不足。对本科除颤培训的满意度与非技术技能量表相关(p < 0.01)。在犹豫量表上得分高的参与者对其护士角色(p < 0.01)和非技术技能(p < 0.01)的信心较低。结论。本科教育质量影响CPR培训师的工作,一些人对除颤感到不确定。培训培训师课程和本科医学教育应更多地关注除颤器的实际操作场景和非技术技能。