Limbach Katharina, Corballis Paul M
School of Psychology and Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2016 Aug;53(8):1154-64. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12666. Epub 2016 May 4.
Recent studies have linked variability in near-threshold stimulus detection to fluctuations in the prestimulus EEG alpha power (α, ∼8-12 Hz). Typically, these studies rely on hit rate as a measure of detection performance and show that detection is enhanced when α power is low compared to when it is high. However, hit rates are determined by both sensitivity to the stimulus and the placement of the response criterion. Here, we investigated the relationships between prestimulus α power and variability in these two measures on a single-trial basis. We confirm earlier reports that detection is inversely related to power in the individual α-frequency band. However, our results show a stronger relationship between α power and response criterion than with sensitivity. Higher α power was related to a more conservative response criterion (i.e., more "no" responses). A response criterion that varies depending on α power might help to optimize performance in an excited state and protect against false positives in a relatively disengaged state.
最近的研究将接近阈值刺激检测的变异性与刺激前脑电图α波功率(α,约8 - 12赫兹)的波动联系起来。通常,这些研究依赖命中率作为检测性能的指标,并表明与α波功率高时相比,α波功率低时检测能力增强。然而,命中率由对刺激的敏感性和反应标准的设定共同决定。在此,我们在单次试验的基础上研究了刺激前α波功率与这两种测量指标变异性之间的关系。我们证实了早期的报告,即检测与个体α频率带的功率呈负相关。然而,我们的结果表明,α波功率与反应标准之间的关系比与敏感性之间的关系更强。较高的α波功率与更保守的反应标准相关(即更多的“否”反应)。根据α波功率变化的反应标准可能有助于在兴奋状态下优化性能,并防止在相对不参与状态下出现误报。