Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55(11-12):3178-3190. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15138. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Ongoing oscillatory neural activity before stimulus onset influences subsequent visual perception. Specifically, both the power and the phase of oscillations in the alpha-frequency band (9-13 Hz) have been reported to predict the detection of visual stimuli. Up to now, the functional mechanisms underlying pre-stimulus power and phase effects on upcoming visual percepts are debated. Here, we used magnetoencephalography recordings together with a near-threshold visual detection task to investigate the neural generators of pre-stimulus power and phase and their impact on subsequent visual-evoked responses. Pre-stimulus alpha-band power and phase opposition effects were found consistent with previous reports. Source localization suggested clearly distinct neural generators for these pre-stimulus effects: Power effects were mainly found in occipital-temporal regions, whereas phase effects also involved prefrontal areas. In order to be functionally relevant, the pre-stimulus correlates should influence post-stimulus processing. Using a trial-sorting approach, we observed that only pre-stimulus power modulated the Hits versus Misses difference in the evoked response, a well-established post-stimulus neural correlate of near-threshold perception, such that trials with stronger pre-stimulus power effect showed greater post-stimulus difference. By contrast, no influence of pre-stimulus phase effects were found. In sum, our study shows distinct generators for two pre-stimulus neural patterns predicting visual perception, and that only alpha power impacts the post-stimulus correlate of conscious access. This underlines the functional relevance of prestimulus alpha power on perceptual awareness, while questioning the role of alpha phase.
在刺激出现之前持续的神经振荡活动会影响随后的视觉感知。具体来说,α频带(9-13 Hz)的振荡幅度和相位都被报道可以预测视觉刺激的检测。到目前为止,关于在即将到来的视觉感知之前,功率和相位效应对刺激前的功能机制仍存在争议。在这里,我们使用脑磁图记录和近阈限视觉检测任务来研究刺激前功率和相位的神经发生器及其对后续视觉诱发电响应的影响。发现刺激前α带功率和相位的反相效应与之前的报告一致。源定位表明,这些刺激前效应具有明显不同的神经发生器:功率效应主要在前颞叶区域发现,而相位效应也涉及前额叶区域。为了具有功能相关性,刺激前相关因素应该影响刺激后的处理。使用试验分类方法,我们观察到只有刺激前的功率调制了诱发电响应中 Hits 与 Misses 的差异,这是近阈限感知的一种公认的刺激后神经相关物,使得具有更强刺激前功率效应的试验具有更大的刺激后差异。相比之下,没有发现刺激前相位效应的影响。总之,我们的研究表明,两种预测视觉感知的刺激前神经模式具有不同的发生器,只有α波功率影响意识访问的刺激后相关物。这强调了刺激前α波功率对感知意识的功能相关性,同时质疑了α波相位的作用。