Reed Evan, Jiang Xia, Kharlamova Nastya, Ytterberg A Jimmy, Catrina Anca I, Israelsson Lena, Mathsson-Alm Linda, Hansson Monika, Alfredsson Lars, Rönnelid Johan, Lundberg Karin
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 May 4;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1001-6.
In addition to anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), antibodies targeting carbamylated (i.e., homocitrullinated) proteins (anti-CarP antibodies) have been described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the extent to which anti-CarP antibodies are truly distinct from ACPA remains unclear, and few studies have focused on specific autoantigens. Here, we examine cross-reactivity between ACPA and anti-CarP antibodies, in the context of the candidate autoantigen α-enolase.
Cross-reactivity was examined by immunoblotting of citrullinated and carbamylated proteins using purified ACPA; and by peptide absorption experiments, using the citrullinated α-enolase peptide CEP-1 and a homocitrulline-containing version (carb-CEP-1) in ELISA. The population-based case-control cohort EIRA (n = 2836 RA; 373 controls) was screened for reactivity with CEP-1 and carb-CEP-1, using the ISAC multiplex array. Associations between anti-CarP antibodies, smoking and genetic risk factors were analysed using unconditional logistic regression models. Differences in antibody levels were investigated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Affinity-purified ACPA was found to bind carbamylated proteins and homocitrulline-containing peptides, demonstrating definitive cross-reactivity between ACPA and anti-CarP antibodies. Anti-carb-CEP-1 reactivity in EIRA was almost exclusively confined to the CEP-1-positive subset, and this group of RA patients (21 %) displayed a particularly strong ACPA response with marked epitope spreading. The small RA subset (3 %) with homocitrulline reactivity in the absence of citrulline reactivity did not associate with smoking or risk genes, and importantly had significantly lower anti-carb-CEP-1 antibody levels.
Our data presented herein cast doubt on the specificity of anti-CarP antibodies in RA, which we posit may be a subset of cross-reactive ACPA.
除抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)外,类风湿关节炎(RA)中还发现了靶向氨甲酰化(即高瓜氨酸化)蛋白的抗体(抗CarP抗体)。然而,抗CarP抗体与ACPA真正不同的程度仍不清楚,很少有研究关注特定自身抗原。在此,我们在候选自身抗原α-烯醇化酶的背景下研究ACPA与抗CarP抗体之间的交叉反应性。
使用纯化的ACPA通过对瓜氨酸化和氨甲酰化蛋白进行免疫印迹来检测交叉反应性;并通过肽吸收实验,在酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中使用瓜氨酸化的α-烯醇化酶肽CEP-1和含高瓜氨酸的版本(carb-CEP-1)。使用国际自身抗体谱分析芯片(ISAC)多重阵列,对基于人群的病例对照队列EIRA(n = 2836例RA患者;373名对照)进行CEP-1和carb-CEP-1反应性筛查。使用无条件逻辑回归模型分析抗CarP抗体、吸烟和遗传风险因素之间的关联。使用曼-惠特尼U检验研究抗体水平的差异。
发现亲和纯化的ACPA可结合氨甲酰化蛋白和含高瓜氨酸的肽,表明ACPA与抗CarP抗体之间存在明确的交叉反应性。EIRA中抗carb-CEP-1反应性几乎完全局限于CEP-1阳性亚组,并且这组RA患者(21%)表现出特别强烈的ACPA反应,伴有明显的表位扩展。在没有瓜氨酸反应性的情况下具有高瓜氨酸反应性的小RA亚组(3%)与吸烟或风险基因无关,重要的是其抗carb-CEP-1抗体水平显著较低。
我们在此展示的数据对RA中抗CarP抗体的特异性提出了质疑,我们认为其可能是交叉反应性ACPA的一个亚组。