Bann Sewon A, Herdman Anthony T
School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 22;10:176. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00176. eCollection 2016.
When and where phonological processing occurs in the brain is still under some debate. Most paired-rhyme and phonological priming studies used word stimuli, which involve complex neural networks for word recognition and semantics. This study investigates early (<300 ms) and late (>300 ms) orthographic and phonological processing of letters.
Fifteen participants aged 20-35 engaged in three two-forced choice experiments, one letter-detection (LetterID) and two letter-rhyme (Paired-Rhyme and Letter-Rhyme) tasks. From the EEG recordings, event related potential (ERP) differences within and across task stimuli were found. We also calculated the global field power (GFP) for each participant. Accuracies and reaction times were also measured from their button presses for each task.
Behavioral: Reaction times were 18 ms faster to letter than pseudoletter stimuli, and 27 ms faster to rhyme than nonrhyme stimuli.
ERP/GFP: In the LetterID task, grand-mean evoked potentials (EPs) showed typical P1, N1, P2, and P3 waveform morphologies to letter and pseudoletter stimuli, with GFPs to pseudoletters being greater than letters from 160-600 ms. Across both rhyme tasks, there were greater negativities for nonrhyme than for rhyme stimuli at 145 ms and 426 ms. The P2 effect for rhyme stimuli was smaller than letter stimuli when compared across tasks.
Differences in early processing of letters vs. pseudoletters between 130-190 ms suggest that letters are processed earlier and perhaps faster in the brain than pseudoletters. The P2 effect between letter and rhyme stimuli likely reflect sublexical phonological processing. Together, findings from our study fill in evidence for the temporal dynamics of orthographic and phonological processing of single letters.
大脑中语音处理发生的时间和位置仍存在一些争议。大多数配对押韵和语音启动研究使用单词刺激,这涉及用于单词识别和语义的复杂神经网络。本研究调查字母的早期(<300毫秒)和晚期(>300毫秒)正字法和语音处理。
15名年龄在20至35岁之间的参与者进行了三项二选一实验,一项字母检测(LetterID)和两项字母押韵(配对押韵和字母押韵)任务。从脑电图记录中,发现了任务刺激内部和之间的事件相关电位(ERP)差异。我们还计算了每个参与者的全局场功率(GFP)。还通过他们在每个任务中的按键操作测量了准确率和反应时间。
行为学:对字母刺激的反应时间比对伪字母刺激快18毫秒,对押韵刺激的反应时间比对非押韵刺激快27毫秒。
ERP/GFP:在LetterID任务中,总体平均诱发电位(EPs)对字母和伪字母刺激显示出典型的P1、N1、P2和P3波形形态,在160至600毫秒期间,伪字母的GFP大于字母。在两项押韵任务中,在145毫秒和426毫秒时,非押韵刺激比押韵刺激有更大的负波。跨任务比较时,押韵刺激的P2效应小于字母刺激。
130至190毫秒之间字母与伪字母早期处理的差异表明,字母在大脑中的处理比伪字母更早且可能更快。字母和押韵刺激之间的P2效应可能反映了次词汇语音处理。总之,我们研究的结果为单个字母正字法和语音处理的时间动态提供了证据。