Woodthorpe Kate, Rumble Hannah
Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath.
School of Social Science, University of Aberdeen.
Br J Sociol. 2016 Jun;67(2):242-59. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12190. Epub 2016 May 5.
Situated at the intersection of the Sociology of Death and Sociology of the Family, this paper argues that the organization and funding of funerals is an overlooked and available lens through which to examine cultural and political norms of familial obligation. Drawing on interviews with claimants to the Department for Work and Pensions' Social Fund Funeral Payment, the paper shows how both responsibility for the organization and payment of a funeral is assumed within families, and how at times this can be overridden by the state. In highlighting the tension between reflexive choice and political norms of family espoused in this policy context, it supports Gilding's () assertion that understanding family practice through reflexivity alone neglects the institutions and conventions within which 'doing' family takes place. In so doing, the paper further makes a case for families and relational negotiations and tensions to be more explicitly included within sociological understanding(s) of death more generally.
本文处于死亡社会学与家庭社会学的交叉点,认为葬礼的组织和资金是一个被忽视但可用的视角,通过它可以审视家庭义务的文化和政治规范。基于对英国工作和养老金部社会基金丧葬补贴申领者的访谈,本文展示了家庭内部如何承担葬礼的组织和费用责任,以及这种责任有时如何被国家推翻。在强调这一政策背景下反思性选择与家庭政治规范之间的紧张关系时,它支持了吉尔丁()的观点,即仅通过反思性来理解家庭实践忽略了“践行”家庭所发生的制度和惯例。通过这样做,本文进一步主张,在更广泛的死亡社会学理解中,应更明确地纳入家庭及关系谈判与紧张关系。