Suppr超能文献

对资本主义全球化提出质疑以及对妇女普遍观点的探讨:对《世界发展报告:性别平等与发展》的跨国女性主义批判

Raising Questions About Capitalist Globalization and Universalizing Views on Women: A Transnational Feminist Critique of the World Development Report: Gender Equality and Development.

作者信息

Scheer Victoria L, Stevens Patricia E, Mkandawire-Valhmu Lucy

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

出版信息

ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;39(2):96-107. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000120.

Abstract

Nursing in the United States has embraced global health primarily from a clinical perspective, with emphasis on care delivery to populations in underserved, resource-poor settings. Less attention has been devoted to developing expertise about social, economic, and political contexts that produce ill health around the world. The purpose of this article is to offer a transnational feminist critique of the World Development Report: Gender Equality and Development and to illuminate implications such reports may have in the lives of the world's most marginalized women and girls. We examine the political economy idealized in the report, raising questions about the capitalist framework underpinning its agenda. Second, we examine the assumptive language used in the report, suggesting that it discursively constructs a problematic representation of women in low-income countries. We contend that the report perpetuates a hegemonic discourse of patriarchy and inequality for women in the Global South through the use of an uncontested economic framework and universalist reasoning. We conclude the article with discussion about a transformative policy making that could be more inclusive of the wisdoms, values, and everyday experiences of women living in the Global South and about the vital role nurses can play in advancing gender equity through their active collaboration in policy critique and policy formulation.

摘要

美国的护理行业主要从临床角度关注全球健康,重点是为服务不足、资源匮乏地区的人群提供护理服务。而对于导致全球健康问题的社会、经济和政治背景方面专业知识的发展则较少关注。本文旨在对《世界发展报告:性别平等与发展》进行跨国女性主义批判,并阐明此类报告可能对世界上最边缘化的妇女和女孩的生活产生的影响。我们审视了报告中理想化的政治经济状况,对支撑其议程的资本主义框架提出质疑。其次,我们审视了报告中使用的假设性语言,认为它在话语层面构建了对低收入国家女性的一种有问题的描述。我们认为,该报告通过使用一个无可争议的经济框架和普遍主义推理,使全球南方女性的父权制和不平等的霸权话语永久化。在文章结尾,我们讨论了一种变革性的政策制定,这种政策制定可以更包容全球南方女性的智慧、价值观和日常经历,以及护士通过积极参与政策批判和政策制定来促进性别平等方面可以发挥的重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验