Kütting Fabian, Schubert Jens, Franklin Jeremy, Bowe Andrea, Hoffmann Vera, Demir Muenevver, Pelc Agnes, Nierhoff Dirk, Töx Ulrich, Steffen Hans-Michael
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;32(2):327-338. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13421.
Current guidelines for clinical practice recommend the infusion of human albumin after large volume paracentesis. After inspecting the current evidence behind this recommendation, we decided to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to address the effect of albumin on mortality and morbidity in the context of large volume paracentesis.
We performed a comprehensive search of large databases and abstract books of conference proceedings up to March 15th 2016 for randomized controlled trials, testing the infusion of human albumin against alternatives (vs no treatment, vs plasma expanders; vs vasoconstrictors) in HCC-free patients suffering from cirrhosis. We analyzed these trials with regard to mortality, changes in plasma renin activity (PRA), hyponatremia, renal impairment, recurrence of ascites with consequential re-admission into hospital and additional complications. We employed trial sequential analysis in order to calculate the number of patients required in controlled trials to be able to determine a statistically significant advantage of the administration of one agent over another with regard to mortality.
We were able to include 21 trials totaling 1277 patients. While the administration of albumin prevents a rise in PRA as well as hyponatremia, no improvement in strong clinical endpoints such as mortality could be demonstrated. Trial sequential analysis showed that at least 1550 additional patients need to be recruited into RCTs and analyzed with regard to this question in order to detect or disprove a 25% mortality effect.
There is insufficient evidence that the infusion of albumin after LVP significantly lowers mortality in HCC-free patients with advanced liver disease.
当前临床实践指南推荐在大量放腹水后输注人血白蛋白。在审视该推荐背后的现有证据后,我们决定进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以探讨在大量放腹水背景下人血白蛋白对死亡率和发病率的影响。
我们全面检索了截至2016年3月15日的大型数据库和会议论文摘要集,以查找随机对照试验,这些试验在无肝细胞癌的肝硬化患者中测试了输注人血白蛋白与其他替代方法(与不治疗相比、与血浆扩容剂相比、与血管收缩剂相比)的效果。我们分析了这些试验的死亡率、血浆肾素活性(PRA)变化、低钠血症、肾功能损害、腹水复发导致再次入院以及其他并发症情况。我们采用试验序贯分析来计算对照试验所需的患者数量,以便能够确定在死亡率方面一种药物的给药相对于另一种药物具有统计学显著优势。
我们纳入了21项试验,共1277例患者。虽然输注白蛋白可防止PRA升高以及低钠血症,但在诸如死亡率等重要临床终点方面未显示出改善。试验序贯分析表明,至少还需要招募1550例患者进入随机对照试验并针对此问题进行分析,以便检测或反驳25%的死亡率效应。
没有足够证据表明在大量放腹水后输注白蛋白能显著降低无肝细胞癌的晚期肝病患者的死亡率。