Borod J C, Vingiano W, Cytryn F
Department of Psychology, Queens College, Flushing, NY 11367.
Int J Neurosci. 1989 Mar;45(1-2):101-10. doi: 10.3109/00207458908986221.
Mechanisms underlying hemispace biases for free-field judgments of emotional intensity in chimeric faces were explored. The Levy et al. chimeric faces task (1983b) was examined in relationship to relevant neuropsychological measures (emotional, imaginal, ocular). Forty-four normal adults were administered a test battery including measures of chimeric face perception, lateral eye movements to nonemotional and emotional instructions, image generation, and ocular dominance ("eyedness"). Overall, subjects showed a significant left-sided bias for judging chimeric faces and for producing lateral eye movements to emotional instructions. Asymmetries for chimeric face perception were significantly correlated with asymmetries for the location of self-generated images in space. When task modalities were examined, there was a specific relationship between chimeric face perception and tactile processing on the other neuropsychological measures.
我们探究了嵌合面孔情绪强度自由场判断中半空间偏向的潜在机制。对Levy等人（1983b）的嵌合面孔任务与相关神经心理学测量指标（情绪、意象、眼部）进行了关联性研究。对44名正常成年人进行了一组测试，包括嵌合面孔感知测量、对非情绪和情绪指令的侧向眼球运动、意象生成以及眼优势（“利手眼”）测量。总体而言，受试者在判断嵌合面孔以及对情绪指令产生侧向眼球运动时表现出显著的左侧偏向。嵌合面孔感知的不对称性与空间中自我生成图像位置的不对称性显著相关。当对任务模式进行研究时，在其他神经心理学测量指标上，嵌合面孔感知与触觉加工之间存在特定关系。
